ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Malpractice Blogs -> Illinois Legal Malpractice Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Malpractice

: Illinois Legal Malpractice Blog

Puncturing of Large Inflatable Rat Leads to Defamation Suit Against an Attorney

By Cassandra Crotty

ADVERTISEMENTS

Not only did I find the law interesting in this case, but it also caught my attention because lately as I have been heading out for lunch with my colleagues in downtown Chicago we have spotted inflatable rats (like the one at issue in the case) being displayed and wondered what the purpose of them was - now I know.  The Illinois appellate court recently held that an absolute privilege applies to a lawyer's defamatory statements to a potential party before a lawsuit is initiated. Atkinson v. Affronti. 

The case stemmed out of the picketing of a construction site because of the use of non-union workers.  The picketers displayed a large inflatable rat to draw attention to their cause.  The rat was punctured by someone who then left the scene, and one of the picketers then filed a police report and accused the superintendent from the work-site of puncturing the inflatable rat.  It was later discovered that someone else was the culprit.  However, before police charges were dropped against the superintendent, the union retained a lawyer to bring a claim against the general contractor from the work-site based on the destruction of the inflatable rat.  The lawyer then wrote a letter to the general contractor informing him of the union's intention to sue for damage to the union's property.  No lawsuit was ever filed.  The superintendent then sued the lawyer for defamation and for placing him is a false light due to the accusations the lawyer made in the letter to the general contractor.

The appellate court held that the litigation privilege applies to defamatory communications made before a lawsuit is commenced and application of the privilege does not require a showing that the defendant acted in good faith.  They further explained that the privilege applies as long as the communication is pertinent to a proposed lawsuit and irrespective of the lawyer's knowledge of the statements falsity or the lawyer's motives.

*Some of the information for this post was gathered from the Professional Liability Reporter, Volume 32, Number 2.

Full post as published by Illinois Legal Malpractice Blog on March 26, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0164 secs (new cache)