Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesEvaluating the Risk of Patent Infringement by Means of Semantic Patent Analysis: The Case of DNA Chips
By Philip Brooks
The above titled article by Isumo Bergmann, Daniel Butzke, Lothar Walter, Jens P. Fuerste, Martin G. Moehrle, and Volker Erdmann appeared in the November 2008 issue of R&D Management (Vol. 38, Issue 5, pp. 550-562). The abstract reads:
In this paper, we are going to present a method for detecting the risks of patent infringement by evaluating similarities between patent documents on the basis of semantic patent analysis. This approach enables the user to visualize similarities in the contents on a semantic patent map by means of multi-dimensional scaling. The effectiveness of the semantic patent map has already been demonstrated by Dressler (2006) with regard to patents of seal technology, in which documents are commonly kept short and the extracted contents are concise. This paper will open out to the field of biotechnology, where patents can easily comprise several hundreds of pages. The method presented here conveys an interdisciplinary approach and combines computer-aided natural language processing with domain-specific expertise of biochemical processes. This is illustrated by an authentic case of infringement involving two manufacturers of DNA chips. Our experiment will show how the infringement case is visualized on a patent map based on semantic patent analysis. This experiment can be compared with the search for a needle in a haystack, the two competitive patents representing significantly conflicting needles. From an approximate number of 4,000 patents in the current US Class 435/6, a set of patents was selected that included the needles mentioned. This paper will point out how such mutual interference can be detected by way of semantic patent analysis, and what advice may be given to R&D managers who are faced with the risk of patent infringement.
You may purchase the article at Social Science Research Network.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on December 16, 2008 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.
Underground Piping
Insituform Technologies awarded $4.5 million patent infringement settlement.
DNA Products
Agilent Technologies pays undisclosed patent infringement settlement to Invitrogen Corporation.

Patent Searching is Not Just Semantics
New District of Delaware Intellectual Property Case Filings
New Patent Searching Tool - Setrue Patent Search.
Contributory infringement of patents: a vexed area of law
Maker of Blackberry Devices Facing New Patent Infringement Challenge
Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 22








