Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogLaNoue & Marcus on "Serious Consideration" of Race-Neutral Alternatives in Higher Education
By Lawrence Solum
George R. LaNoue and Kenneth L. Marcus (University of Maryland, Baltimore County and CUNY Baruch College School of Public Affairs) have posted 'Serious Consideration' of Race-Neutral Alternatives in Higher Education on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
What does it mean for a college or university to "seriously consider" race-neutral alternatives? Contemporary affirmative action jurisprudence requires post-secondary institutions to address this question, yet does little to answer it. By requiring universities to conduct "serious, good-faith consideration of workable race-neutral alternatives" before engaging in non-remedial race-conscious activities-but without specifying the requisite nature and scope of this "consideration" - the Court has left many institutions to wonder what is needed to satisfy the Court. Commentators have explored various approaches, including class-rank plans, socioeconomic preferences, and lottery assignment plans. What courts and commentators have largely failed to explore, however, is the basic methodological question: What, specifically, does it mean to give serious consideration to these alternatives? This Article argues that basic principles of program evaluation provide clear standards and criteria for serious program consideration, and that application of these methodologies is mandated by the Court's decisions. As litigation will increasingly focus on narrow tailoring, administrators' failure to apply proper program analysis to race-neutral alternatives could jeopardize many diversity programs. Moreover, the absence of requisite program analysis of race-neutral alternatives will lead to uncertainty, confusion, and disregard for the law. Thus, this Article supplies a framework for identifying meaningful program evaluation standards that can enable universities to comply with the requirements set forth in affirmative action jurisprudence.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on November 26, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Department of Education Fraud
$4.25 million settlement to be paid in whistleblower lawsuit.
Racist Voicemail
Stamford Board of Education pays student $37,500 settlement after failing to protect her from racial discrimination.
Discrimination
race, gender, disability, religious or age discrimiation.
Wal-Mart
To Pay $17.5 Million To Settle Race Bias Suit
Kodak
Settles Race Discrimination Class Action for $21 Million
Compass Group
Faces Federal Race Discrimination Class Action

Law School That Didn't Exist Is Sued by Student Who Didn't Take Classes
MA: Higher education shouldn't take a back seat to prisons
Publication: Handbook for lawyers who are new to higher ed
The Next Great Wave in American Higher Education, Part 1
Law: Congress may consolidate tuition tax credits








