Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Alabama Appellate Watch
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: Alabama Appellate WatchAlabama Court of Civil Appeals Releases Two Cases Showing Different Sides of Final Judgment Rule
On November 14, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released two cases involving different sides of the final judgment rule.
Evans v. First National Bank of Jasper, involved an appeal from an action on a promissory note and security agreement. The plaintiff bank alleged a breach of contract claim seeking the balance due on a contract, plus an attorney fee, or, in the alternative, seeking the recovery of the vehicle financed pursuant to the contract. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the bank on the breach of contract claim. There was no ruling on the alternative claim. for possession.
In Smith v. Smith, the wife in a divorce action appealed from the trial court's rulings following remand from the Court of Civil Appeals. The order appealled from ordered that the wife was not entitled to a share of a personal injury award that the husband received and ordered the husband to pay the wife's health insurance premiums for six months. The order did not, however, adjudicate the wife's claim for periodic alimony.
The Court of Civil Appeals considered its jurisdiction in each case, noting in both Evans and Smith that a judgment is only final if nothing remains to be done in the trial court. Application of the same rule resulted in different outcomes. In Evans, although the alternative claim for possession had not been adjudicated, the judgment was still considered final because to award both money damages and possession would be to allow an impermissible double recovery. There was, therefore, nothing left to be done in the trial court. There was nothing to save the appeal in Smith, however. There, the trial court simply did not adjudicate the issue of periodic alimony. That issue remained to be adjudicated and the judgment could not be considered final and would not support an appeal.
Full post as published by Alabama Appellate Watch on November 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Alabama Restaurant Association Hires Legal Council to Help Members Damaged by BP Oil Spill
Alabama Restaurant Association Hires Legal Council to Help Members Damaged by BP Oil Spill>
Alabama Suzuki Dealer
Faces Class Action
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Inmate Medical Negligence
Olmsted County awards former inmate $337,000 settlement after failing to get him to a hospital after showing signs of a heart attack.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.

Excellent Resource For Alabama Supreme Court Decisions
Ohio Supreme Court clarifies requirements for trial court "final orders"
Good Thoughts On Offers Of Judgment In FDCPA Cases
EPA Final Rule Exempts Farm Reporting on Animal Waste
COA Holds That Plaintiff Need Not Move For Entry Of Default Before Moving For Default Judgment
Appeals Court Rule on Unpublished Decisions
Ky. Court of Appeals releases 26 cases on Oct. 31
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas Reverses Vioxx Case Judgment Against Merck & Co.
The Michigan Litigation Process - Appeals









