Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Tenth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Tenth Circuit Blog10th Circuit decisions
By Shari Allison
ADVERTISEMENTS
U.S. v. Williams, 2008 WL 4636724 (10/21/08) (unpub'd) & U.S. v. Leroy, 2008 WL 4636725 (10/21/08) (unpub'd) - Two cases with identical language from two different panels with a total of six different judges calling into question the chances of applying Booker to § 3582(c)(2) cases. In both cases, the pro se defendants didn't qualify for a retroactive crack reduction because they were sentenced as career offenders. But in rejecting the defendants' reliance on Booker, the panels, after referring to § 1B1.10's requirement that all non-retroactive guideline calculations remain the same, state: "Thus, § 3582(c)(2) permits the court to consider only whether Mr. [Williams/Leroy] is entitled to a two-level offense reduction under Amendment 706 [the crack cocaine amendment], not to reevaluate his sentence under the Guidelines...continue to full postFull post as published by Tenth Circuit Blog on October 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Lawsuits and Settlements
Health Insurers
Dictating Medical Decisions
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

10th Circuit Rules on SORNA's Retroactivity
10th Circuit Rejects Challenge to the Crosses of Las Cruces, NM
10th Circuit upholds child pornography conviction
10th Circuit: Las Cruces Cross Logo is not unconstitutional
10th Circuit: CLS, ADF attorneys secure victory in Colo. student funding case








