Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sex Crimes
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sex Crimes10th Circuit Rules on SORNA's Retroactivity
By Corey Rayburnyung
ADVERTISEMENTS
In U.S. v. Husted, the 10th Circuit has gone against the majority of courts reviewing SORNA prosecutions by finding that retroactive application of the statute to interstate travel before the passage of the Act was in conflict with the plain language of the statute. From the opinion:As noted, § 2250(a)(2)(B) applies to whomever ?travels in interstate . . .
commerce? (emphasis added). Congress?s use of the present tense form of the
verb ?to travel? indicates that SORNA?s coverage is limited to those individuals
who travel in interstate commerce after the Act?s effective date.4 See 1 U.S.C.
§ 1 (directing courts that, unless context indicates otherwise, ?words used in the
present tense include the future as well as the present?); United States v...continue to full postFull post as published by Sex Crimes on November 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Lawsuits and Settlements
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

2d Circuit Rejects Retroactivity Challenge to § 469 Passive Loss Rules
Important and impressive Fifth Circuit ruling concerning crack retroactivity
10th Circuit Rules Against Native American in RFRA Case
EDNY Judge Denies Full-Blown Resentencing Under Crack Retroactivity Amendment
10th Circuit Rejects Challenge to the Crosses of Las Cruces, NM







