Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawFederal District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan upholds rule prohibiting the wearing of political buttons in New York City Schools
Source: Newspaper report of decision
The New York City Board of Education?s October 1, 2008 issue of Principals? Weekly advised its readers as follows:
"In light of the upcoming presidential election, it is important that schools comply with Chancellor?s Regulation D-130 with respect to the conduct of employees while on duty or in contact with students and the distribution of campaign literature. [Note: Regulation D-130 is posted on the Internet at : http://docs.nycenet.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-86/D-130__1-15-04.pdf ]
"The regulation requires employees to maintain a posture of complete neutrality with respect to political candidates while they are on duty or in contact with students. Therefore, school staff may not wear buttons or apparel in support of a political candidate while in school or during school activities.
"The regulation prohibits the distribution or posting of materials in support of a political candidate in a school building. However, the regulation permits materials advocating the election of a candidate to be placed in staff mailboxes if the materials are an integral part of a regularly published staff newspaper or newsletter. Separate inserts for purposes of campaigning may not be included in such publications or distributed via staff mailboxes.
"In addition, campaigning and fundraising by employees during work hours are strictly prohibited.
"Failure to comply with the regulation may result in disciplinary action."
New York City?s United Federation of Teachers challenged the prohibition against wearing buttons or apparel in support of a political candidate in Federal District Court. Federal District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan upheld the Board of Education?s policy banning the wearing items indicating support of or opposition to a candidate for partisan political office.
In an earlier ?political statement? case, Scott v Goodman, 941 F. Supp. 424, a federal district court ruled that the New York City Transit Authority?s rule prohibiting employees from wearing buttons, badges, or other insignia on their uniforms without permission was an ?overbroad restriction on the public employees? speech in violation of the First Amendment because the rule applied to uniformed employees at times when they are not in contact with customers, as well as to employees whose duties do not involve any customer contact.?
The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed the district court?s ruling.
The Circuit Court decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=2nd&navby=case&no=987731 .
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on October 20, 2008 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
New York Building Codes
Building and constructions laws in New York
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
New York City
Seniors' Centers Found to Have Exposed Asbestos-Pipe Insulation
New York City
$1.5 million settlement after a family of four was killed by an off duty drunken police officer.
New York Employment Law
alleged violations of New York employment law.
Reddy Ice Holdings Inc., Arctic Glacier International Inc., and Home City Ice Co.
allegedly violated federal antitrust laws by fixing prices for packaged cubed, crushed, block, and dry ice in the US and Canada.

Judge Kaplan Reprimands Hedge Funds in Takeover Battle with CSX
"Court Upholds Key Provision of the Voting Rights Act"








