Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: PrawfsBeyond the Traditional Syllabus: Using Narrative to Teach Torts
By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel
Last week, I wrote about one of the ways (using a Navajo court opinion and a Canadian case) that I have tried to expand my syllabus beyond the traditional state and federal appellate opinions.
Yesterday, I had a tremendously energetic class based on a case reading that wasn't a judicial opinion at all.
Our reading was a personal-injury attorney's first-person narrative of Howard v. Collins & Aikman Corp. (N.C. Super. Ct. 1990), a wrongful death suit brought by a four-year-old boy after an overworked tractor-trailer driver crossed into oncoming traffic, jackknifed his rig, and crawled up on top of the passenger car of the boy?s mother and father.
The author, of course, is John Edwards. Before he was a meteorically rising and falling presidential candidate, he was a multi-multi-multi-million-dollar success as a tort lawyer. So we have his political ambitions to thank for the valuable residue left over in the form of his autobiographical collection of plaintiff-side war stories, Four Trials.
I'm using each of the four chapters this year to replace an appellate opinion on my syllabus. Each chapter discusses one case, and in so doing, does what a good appellate opinion should for a law-school class: It presents facts, applies law, and serves as a basis for classroom dialog. But these narratives go so much further, exposing the tactical, strategic, and human side of lawyering that lies beyond the sightlines of the appellate bench. The facts are richer, and the real-world context for the legal doctrine is more clear. Best of all, the text is gripping and imminently readable. These stories make marvelous teaching tools, and I urge you to try them. USA Today published an excerpt you can assign without using the book itself. If you want more, the paperback adds a relatively guilt-free $13 to students' bookstore bills.
Here's a list of chapters, corresponding doctrinal topics, and specific page assignments (so you can skip the campaign-preening interludes):
Sawyer v. St. Joseph's Hospital (Chapter 1 "E.G.")
- medical malpractice
- settlement dynamics
- professional standard of care
portion directly concerning the case: pp. 17-48
Campbell v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital (Chapter 2 "Jennifer")
- medical malpractice
- informed consent
- remittitur
portion of chapter directly concerning the case: pp. 51-113
Howard v. Collins & Aikman Corp. (Chapter 3 "Josh")
- breach of duty
- compensatory damages
- punitive damages
portion directly concerning the case: pp. 131 (new section) to 159
Lakey v. Sta-Rite Industries (Chapter 4 "Valerie")
- products liability
portion of chapter directly concerning the case: pp. 178 (new section) to 230
Full post as published by Prawfs on October 16, 2008 (boomark / email).

Torts Opening at Southern Illinois
Sebok on Using Comparative Materials in a 1L Torts Class
Sen. Obama Voting Rights Syllabus
Georgia Seeks Torts Podium Visitor Next Fall
The Syllabus as a Student-Teacher Contract, Now Including Legalese








