Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> India Law & Tech
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: India Law & TechSee you in court ?
By Apar
Ambush marketing was at play again when Airtel sought to launch its DTH services. Airtel to build up pre-launch hype ran an ad campaign which teased viewers with the display of a red sofa and a voice over, “See you at home”. The wily advertisers at rival Big TV, a bussiness concern of the Reliance Group subsequently ran a campaign which displayed a red sofa, used the voice over as well as displayed the Big TV brand prominently. This is reminiscent of Pepsi Co’s “nothing official about it” marketing campaign to counter Coca-Cola bieng the official sponsor of in the 1996 Cricket World Cup. It is apparent that such gurella advertising causes a loss of goodwill above the obvious gotcha!
So what are the legal recourses available in such a situation to Mr. Bharti Mittal against Mr. Anil Ambani ?? None, if you rely on ICC Development (International) Limited v. Arvee Enterprises and Anr (Ia No. 9854/2002 In Suit No. 1710/2002). The judgement after noting that the action falls outside the scope of the Trademarks Act notes that even a passing off action cannot be maintained ! It states that “ambush marketing” is a bussiness term and passinf off actions do not cover it. Strange as it may sound there does not seem to be a developed body of law as well asany recourse for corporates who are victims of ambush marketing.
Full post as published by India Law & Tech on October 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

A Proposal to Crowdsource Quality Control at the Supreme Court
Contempt of Court (Just a comedy)
Tax Court Issues Phishing Warning
6th Circuit: Tax Court Is Not a "Court" and Thus Lacks Power to Transfer Case to District Court








