Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Miscellaneous Blogs -> Quiz Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Miscellaneous
: Quiz LawThe Constitutional Impact of the Election
Almost all lawyers know the name Erwin Chemerinsky. That's because almost all lawyers prepare for the bar by taking classes with BarBri, and they therefore all wind up seeing a six-hour lecture by Chemerinsky, done entirely from memory, which is basically everything you need to know about con law. It's pretty impressive. Dude is smart, I'm saying.
So when he writes an article about the major impact the upcoming election could have on the make-up of the Supreme Court I, for one, pay attention. It boils down to this:
As a result of its current makeup, however, the Supreme Court is likely to tilt only in one direction after this year. Simply put, the November election may well determine whether the court becomes significantly more conservative or its ideological balance remains roughly the same. And a McCain-shaped Supreme Court, pushed farther to the right, could have dramatic and long-lasting consequences for the rights of Americans.
Even if Obama wins the election, it is far less likely that the Supreme Court will become more liberal in the near term. This is because any vacancies on the court between Jan. 20, 2009, and Jan. 20, 2013, are likely to come among the three most liberal justices. John Paul Stevens is 88 years old. Although he is in good health, it seems unlikely that he will still be on the court at age 93 in 2013. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 75. Perhaps because she is frail in appearance there is always speculation that she might step down. There is a widely circulated rumor that David Souter (now 69) wants to retire and go home to New Hampshire.
Because I'm a liberal, I generally prefer the liberal justices to the conservatives. But frankly, I wouldn't want an entirely liberal bench. There is much to be said for a properly weighted bench that has voices covering the spectrum. But the notion of the Supremes getting more conservative, and the fact that it would likely keep that conservative bend for quite some time ... well that scares the crap outta me.
Anyway, for those of you trying to educate yourself about this election, Chemerinsky's article makes for a good read.
Full post as published by Quiz Law on October 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Mirrors
Recalled Due to Impact and Laceration Hazards
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
alleging government agencies and officials violated immigrant workers' constitutional rights.
Right-of-Way
City of Hastings pays preacher $1 settlement and $10,000 in legal fees for constitutional right violations.
Cowboy Hat
Lincoln County pays citizen $10,500 settlement for Constitutional Rights violations.

Levinson, the election, and constitutional procedural "minefields"
Safjan on Politics & Constitutional Courts
Vote law appeal likely by early Fall
Cartel Enforcement and the Election
What prompts structural constitutional amendments
The High Court's Seemingly Mundane Docket








