Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Qui Tam Blogs -> Virginia Qui Tam Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Qui Tam
: Virginia Qui Tam LawNew Opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia interprets Virginia's Nonsuit Statute in the qui tam context
By Zachary A. Kitts

A new opinion by Chief Judge Jones in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia interprets Virginia's nonsuit statute as tolling the statute of limitations on a retaliation claim under 31 U.S.C. 3730(h). To my knowledge, this is the first time a federal court has interpreted Virginia's unique nonsuit statute in the context of a 3730(h) claim. The case is United States ex rel Herndon v. Appalachian Regional Community Head Start, Inc., Civil Case No. 2:07cv0003 (W.D. Va.).
Virginia's nonsuit statute, which is found at Virginia Code 8.01-380, allows a civil plaintiff to voluntarily "nonsuit" his action one time, at any time prior to the case's submission to a jury, or to the court if the matter is being decided by a bench trial.
Simply stated, the nonsuit constitutes a dismissal without prejudice, and the plaintiff then has the longer of six months from the date the nonsuit order was entered, or until the actual statute of limitations period runs, to refile his or her suit.
Virginia Supreme Court opinions have made it clear that this is an absolute right, and that no condition can be placed upon a plaintiff's right to one nonsuit. As one might imagine, the nonsuit can be a powerful tactical tool if used by a plaintiff to its full potential.
Congratulations to Abingdon lawyer and TAF Member Mark T. Hurt for this victory.
Zachary A. Kitts
Cook & Kitts, PLLC
Full post as published by Virginia Qui Tam Law on September 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
State of Virginia
$11 million settlement reached in Virginia Tech massacre.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
Repossessed car wins $700,000 Settlement
A class action lawsuit that was brought against Virginia Beach-based Tidewater Finance Co., alleging that the company had questionable repossession practices, has been settled.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
The Plainfield School District
$10,500 settlement resolves eminent domain dispute.

Forwarding Employer Email To Personal Account Supports Conversion Claim
All U.S. District Courts Now Using CM/ECF, With the Addition of the Western District of Wisconsin
President nominates Glen E. Conrad to 4th Circuit
6th. Cir. Decisions for Week of Jul 14-18, 2008 (Ky - 2 Pub, 2 NPO)









