Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> National Eminent Domain Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: National Eminent Domain BlogWater Company's Rights
By Alan Ackerman
An Aqua Indiana customer on Windsor Road, Steger bought a water softener and replaced a dishwasher and garbage disposal because of the harshness of his water, he said.
But the somewhat graphic description of his water’s color is the most telling.
“I would take showers and the water would turn the gray hairs on my chest red,” he said.
But people like Steger – who complain about the company’s water service – are becoming rarer, at least according to the number of complaints received by the private utility. In fact, complaints about water color, poor pressure and other service problems dropped by a third on average from 2004 through 2006, when compared with the previous three years.
One of the city’s main reasons to take over the private northern system was to provide better water.
The city started an eminent domain action in 2002 to acquire the northern system. Last summer, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled in a 3-2 vote that the city can take the utility through eminent domain. Aqua Indiana is challenging the city’s $16.9 million appraisal of its assets, but has not yet publicly offered what it believes is a fair price.
Steger, 68, bought his home on Windsor with the promise his home was on City Utilities. Upon discovering the water was from Aqua Indiana, he installed a water softener for $500, which he said was necessary to make the water potable. Even with the softener, he said the water still comes out red or black at times. He said he pays about $18 a month for salt for the softener.
Even if the cost of acquiring the private utility comes in more expensive for the city, Steger said he would be willing to pay a premium to relieve himself of the hassles.
“I don’t mind paying for a quality product,” he said.
-This article serves as a harsh repudiation of the water company’s fair rights. Given that the case is to be tried by a jury of peers in the community, when the community offers phone numbers to call for “complaints,” one wonders how fairly the water company can be treated in this situation.
Full post as published by National Eminent Domain Blog on January 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
California Limited Liability Company Formation
Relevant information for starting a limited liability company in California
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Veolia Water
allegedly overestimated water usage for residential customers.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Chocolate Discharge
G.K.I. Foods agrees to $43,000 settlement after disposing production waste water into a sanitary waste water system.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Gaiam Water Bottles Containing BPA
Gaiam Bottles alleging water bottles contain BPA even though they were marketed as not containing Bisphenol A.
SIGG Admits to Trace BPA in Metal Water Bottles
SIGG Admits to BPA in Metal Water Bottles

Smith on Semicommons & Water Rights
Federal Circuit: Government Diversion of Water For Fish Ladder is Per Se Taking
ACI Pharma/Biotech IP Due Diligence Conference







