Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Neuroethics and Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Neuroethics and LawDiminishing the arm's race in enhancement (Reiner)
By Peter Reiner
Carl Elliot has a piece over at Atlantic.com arguing that beta blockers should not be viewed as enhancement, but rather as leveling the playing field between individuals who suffer anxiety while performing a particular task (for example public speaking or pistol shooting) and those who do not. His basic tenet is sound - that we should evaluate people based on the content of their actions rather than a distraction such as anxiety, which really has nothing to do with performance per se. Carl concludes with the convincing argument that we would all likely prefer a neurosurgeon whose hands did not shake while they were slipping sharp metal objects into our brains, and if beta blockers were required to insure that was the case, so be it.
The clever part of Carl's line of reasoning is that it eliminates the arm's race aspect of the enhancement debate: if enhancers become widely available, and everyone takes them, the bar for average performance rises for all. The inherent features of beta-blockers - that they work only for those that need them - makes this argument moot. It is too early to tell whether a similar situation will arise with cognitive enhancers, but there have been rumours to the effect that these agents may be more effective for those with less cognitive endowment than those whose cognitive capacities are already at or near peak. Not only would this reduce (but not eliminate) the problem of off-label use by younger individuals, but it would also diminish the likelihood of these drugs triggering an arms race of cognitive enhancer use for many of the same reasons that Carl invokes for beta blockers. It may be wishful thinking to hope that pharmacological effects align with societal values, but the case of beta-blockers demonstrates that sometimes wishes do come true.
[The photo is an image of propanalol crystals courtesy of Richard Howey's Crystal Gallery]
Full post as published by Neuroethics and Law on September 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Male Enhancement Products
Recalled Nationwide by Nature & Health
Discrimination
race, gender, disability, religious or age discrimiation.
Wal-Mart
To Pay $17.5 Million To Settle Race Bias Suit
Kodak
Settles Race Discrimination Class Action for $21 Million
Compass Group
Faces Federal Race Discrimination Class Action
Speedway Fatality
'Amazing Race' family wins lawsuit with Daytona Speedway.

Brain Versus Brawn in the Enhancement Debate (Reiner)
Two further indictments of the media in reporting on neuroethics (Reiner)
Nature survey on cognitive enhancement (Reiner)
Foreclosure Cases Making Big Money for Small Firms
Special Commentary Section in Nature on Cognitive Enhancement (Reiner)









