Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Blawg
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IP BlawgSony Seeks To Settle
By Farella Braun + Martel LLP
Following up on our November 15 post about Sony?s public relations and legal woes connected to the ?root kit? software built into certain of its music CDs, we?ve learned that Sony is seeking to settle one of the class action lawsuits brought against it.
A filing by the plaintiffs? counsel seeking the federal court?s approval of the settlement terms describes the contours of the deal, which include:
? a recall by Sony of all of the ?rootkit? CDs,
? provision by Sony of software to uninstall the content protection software on affected machines;
? a system of small cash payments, ?clean? replacement CDs, and/or free music downloads for class members who purchased or used the ?rootkit? CDs, and
? consumer safeguard restrictions on any future implementation by Sony of content protection software for its music before 2008.
Interestingly, the consumer safeguard restrictions ? which would be enforceable through a court injunction ? are useful guideposts to any content provider seeking to chart a more cautious course towards implementing content protection measures. The requirements that the settlement would impose would require Sony to:
1) ensure that the software is not installed on a user?s computer unless the user affirmatively accepts the pop-up license agreement,
2) ensure that an uninstaller for the content protection software is made readily available to consumers,
3) ensure that the functionality of any updates or material changes in how the copy protection software is used is adequately disclosed,
4) ensure that the pop-up license agreement displayed to the user accurately describes the software in plain English
5) obtain comments about the license agreement from an independent third party
6) obtain an opinion from a qualified third party that the content protection software does not create any known security vulnerabilities,
7) collect only such information from CD users, but not personally identifiable information, as is necessary to provide the software functionality,
8) include on the jewel case a disclosure that the CD contains the content protection software; and
9) commit to fix any discovered security vulnerabilities through software updates verified as secure by a computer security expert.
What do you think of these consumer safeguard measures? Do they go far enough to protect consumers? Would another content provider following these guidelines be able to avoid the public relations difficulties that Sony has faced?
Today's Blogger: Eric Bass
Full post as published by IP Blawg on January 09, 2006 (boomark / email).
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment
Canadian Government
seeks new law enabling them to search your laptop
TVA Coal Ash
Class Action Seeks $5 Million in Damages
Sony Lithium Ion Batteries Recalled
Reports of Overheating, Burns and Property Damage
Verizon To Pay $52 Million To Settle
Verizon To Pay $52 Million To Settle "Pay as You Go" Data Charges FCC Investigation
Disabilities Groups Settle with Caltrans for $1.1 Billion
Disabilities Groups Settle with Caltrans for $1.1 Billion

Urteil zum Gemeinschaftsunternehmen Sony BMG aufgehoben
Battle of the eBook Readers: Sony Takes a Swing at Expanding Its Market
Sony Recalls VAIO Laptops Due to Overheat Risk
Case: MicroUnity v. SCEA Settles
LG Hamburg: Beweiswert von Rasch-Dokumenten
Nintendo and Sony Sued for Violating Controller Patents









