Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Charlottesville Personal Injury LawyerCourt System Integral To Guaranteeing Drug Safety
By Greg Webb
Editors from the New England Journal of Medicine, one of the nation's most influential medical journals, are giving the Supreme Court unsolicited legal advice about a major case, Wyeth v. Levine, that could have major implications for litigation over potentially dangerous drugs, such as Vioxx. In a friend-of-the-court brief, the editors argued the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is "in no position" to guarantee drug safety. Although the FDA is the "gold standard" in drug evaluation, the editors asked the justices to be skeptical. They go on to say that lawsuits can serve as a "vital deterrent" and protect American consumers if drug companies do not divulge the risks involved with their product; the FDA alone does not have the capabilities to act as the sole regulator for keeping the drug market safe. It is spread too thin and completely understaffed and underfunded. The court system is the last defense individuals have against manufacturers who have not made the risks from their product clear to the public.
In Wyeth v. Levine, Diane Levine lost her right arm below the elbow after being injected by the drug Phenergan, a medication for nausea, causing her to develop gangrene. She sued the manufacturer, Wyeth, claiming the company had an obligation to warn its consumers of the potential risk from the injection. The courts in her state agreed and awarded her $7 million. However, Wyeth appealed, arguing it was protected from lawsuits since state courts cannot overturn the FDA's judgment. The FDA considers and approves the labeling for the drug and the manufacturer is generally banned from making unilateral changes to the approved labeling, so Wyeth believes it should not be able to be sued.
These medical editors joined with forty-seven state attorneys general and two former FDA commissioners in supporting Ms. Levine's position, while the Bush administration is supporting Wyeth. Many people are closely watching this case since the Supreme Court recently ruled that manufacturers of FDA-approved medical devices are shielded from litigation in state courts. However, the statute that applies to the medical devices is different from the law that governs medications.Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg Webb
Full post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on September 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Firestone Tire Problems Raise Questions of Safety
Are Your Car Tires Safe?
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Mitchell Report Summary
Report on Steroid Drug Use in Major League Baseball by Senator George Mitchell
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Drug Manufacturer Rebates
Caremark Corp. agrees to pay $38.5 million settlement after convincing doctors to switch drug brands.
Safety Violations
Murphy Oil USA Inc. to pay $179,100 settlement in occupational safety violations lawsuit.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
AIG
and Ex Execs to pay $115 Million to Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana
Heating System Thermostats
Recalled due to Shock Hazard

New GAO Report: FDA Initiatives and Drug Safety
New WellPoint System to Identify Drug Problems
FDA Begins Quarterly Drug Safety Reports
FDA Drug Approval Near Deadline Linked to Safety Problems
Supreme Court to hear potential policy-changing product liability lawsuit







