Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Harmful Error

Criminal Law

: Harmful Error

Proposed NRAP changes, a little at a time: NRAP 29, 30

This is the eleventh in a series of posts looking at proposed changes to the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Nevada Supreme Court will hear public comment on October 6. The Court welcomes written comments about the proposed amendments. Previous posts on this topic: Proposed changes to NRAP 1, 2 and 3 Proposed changes to NRAP 3A, 3B and 3C Proposed changes to NRAP 3D, 3E and 4 Proposed changes to NRAP 5, 7 and 8 Proposed changes to NRAP 9 Proposed changes to NRAP 10, 11, 12 and 13 Proposed changes to NRAP 14, 21 and 22 Proposed changes to NRAP 23, 24, 25 and 25A Proposed changes to NRAP 26, 27 Proposed changes to NRAP 28, 28.1 and 28.2 NRAP 29 Brief of an Amicus Curiae (page 75 of the pdf) Subsection (a) When Permitted The proposed changes are stylistic Subsection (b) Foreign Counsel A new rule would be added: "If an amicus brief is prepared by an attorney who is not a member of the State Bar of Nevada, that attorney must move for permission to appear before the Supreme Court under SCR 42 and comply with Rule 46(a)...continue to full post

Full post as published by Harmful Error on August 27, 2008 (boomark / email).