Home -> Law Blog Directory -> In-House Counsel Blogs -> Law Department Management
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
In-House Counsel
: Law Department ManagementManagers should ponder the direction and reality of cause and effect when they make decisions
By Rees Morrison
It is fascinating to mull over what causes what. A few comments on this blog have adverted to cause and effect (See my posts of Nov. 11, 2007 on four contexts that vary by cause and effect; May 14, 2005 on ?proof by anecdote?; and Jan. 1, 2008 on agency theory.). Many times I write in terms of a fact situation ?causing? another situation, such as legal complexity being partly determined by the regulatory burdens on an industry (See my post of Dec. 14, 2005.). Three other observations are in order.
One point to ponder is which event is cause and which event is effect? Did a lower attrition rate result from an improved evaluation process or the other way around? Several of my postings have explicitly questioned a cause-and-effect direction (See my posts of Dec. 21, 2005 about emotional intelligence and success; Jan. 27, 2006 on in-house counsel and revenue per employee; Sept. 10, 2005 on law firm size and prominence in league tables; July 2, 2007 on market capitalization and the number of lawyers in a company; and Jan. 27, 2006 on business managers in law departments and lower total costs.).
A second point concerns the degree to which something causes something else. Historian use the term ?over-determined? for the notion that an event has many antecedents and that it is very hard to disentangle which of them had priority (See my post of Nov. 24, 2007 on factors that put pressure on in-house counsel.). It is impossible to say, ?Budgets accounted for 29% of our savings last year.? A magazine used the colorful phrase, ?the hogswallow of multiple causation.?
The final conundrum is whether there was a confounding or determining third factor (See my post of Dec.12, 2006 on instrumental variables.)? For example, if you added a paralegal and outside counsel spending dropped, did spending actually decline because of the mix of lawsuits you faced changed?
Full post as published by Law Department Management on January 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Health Insurers
Dictating Medical Decisions
US Reality TV Shows
Reach Tentative $4 Million Settlement
Albertsons et al.
allegedly injected dye into farm raised salmon to make it appear more palatable.
Holiday Inn Express
Complimentary simplySmart™ "Remove" Make Up Remover Recalled
Cipro
The FDA is seeking to add black box warnings of the risk of tendon rupture associated with Cipro and Levaquin.
The ruptures can involve Achilles tendon, shoulder, hand, bicep or thumb tendons, and is especially increased in patients older than 60, or people who have received kidney, heart or lung transplants, as well as people on steroid therapy...
Correctional Managers
Jury orders Marion County to pay $1 million racial discrimination settlement to two former employees.

Collection of IRS withholding taxes against business owners and managers
Making your office a fun place to work.
The Supreme Court: reality v. fiction
Cal Supremes Ponder Challenges to Gay-Marriage Ban
Will California marriage redefinition impact Arizona









