Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Mobile Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Mobile Personal Injury LawyerApology Laws
By Gaines Drago
Surfing the internet a few weekends ago I came across this article from a Dallas based plaintiffs firm discussing new measures state legislatures are taking to curb medical malpractice payouts. The apology laws, as they are being touted, basically state the contention that most med. mal cases are brought out of anger due to the victim's belief that health care providers show little concern for their contribution to the plaintiff's injuries. The legislators feel as though if doctors and medical personnel are able to have open communication with victims, free from repercussion, fewer suits would be filed and lower amounts of punitive damages would be awarded, thereby lowering costs. The article states that nineteen states have adopted such laws which allegedly protect and encourage health care employees to apologize and speak candidly with victims. Several VA hospitals have tried to put this theory into practice and have found that payouts have been lowered by $80,000. While, I in no way discourage open communication between the health care provider and the patient, I feel that not every consideration for the plaintiff's future well-being is taken into account by such practices. The article states, and I agree, that one of the disadvantages is the lack consideration for the future financial support many of these victims face. Many times expediency of settlement would limit the ability of the victim to consider possible repercussions and expenses he/she will face in the future. The apology laws do not provide for the kind of screening and planning that the victim needs to consider before just accepting a quick financial settlement. My knowledge of this subject is limited, due to my inexperience, but it just appears, while the concept of more open lines of communication is no doubt beneficial, I wonder if the best interests of the victim are what these laws really protect.
Source: http://www.wiredprnews.com/2008/06/22/dallas-veterans-medical-malpractice_20080622358.html
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Gaines DragoFull post as published by Mobile Personal Injury Lawyer on August 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Grubb & Ellis
alleging violations of fiduciary duties to shareholders and securities laws.
Hewlett-Packard and Staples
allegedly violated antitrust laws in collaborating on the sale of replacement ink jet printer cartridges.
Damaged Billboards
Lamar Advertising pays $35,000 settlement after violating permit laws.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Home Buyers Consulting Network, Inc.
$613, 000 settlement reached in federal laws violation dispute.








