ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: IPBiz

IBM's 7,407,089 "paper or plastic" patent

By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
There's a lot of buzz about IBM's US Patent No. 7,407,089 titled System and method for determining packaging preference with first claim:

A method of determining a customer's packaging preference in a conventional point-of-sale retail location, wherein the point-of-sale retail location includes a person who performs the packaging of items purchased in the point-of-sale retail location for the customer, comprising the steps of:

identifying the customer using a customer identifier; and
retrieving available container packaging preference information for the purchased items using the customer identifier for the identified customer.

The listed inventor is Kyle N. Patrick, and the law firm was the Pastel Law Firm.

In light of IBM's past history of procuring dubious patents, the "paper or plastic" patent should not come as a surprise.

In the IPBiz post
The "future of computing" at IBM: trivial or schizophrenic?
one had a claim:

A system for reducing customer dissatisfaction for waiting, said system comprising: a queue monitoring subsystem that detects an entry of a customer into a waiting queue;a reward computing subsystem that calculates a reward for the customer for being in the waiting queue; anda communication subsystem to communicate the reward to the customer,wherein at least one of said queue monitoring subsystem, said reward computing subsystem, and said communication subsystem is automated.

*And don't forget the toilet queue patent-->

http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/03/patent-reform-and-ibms-questionable.html

The bottom line: the "patent quality" argument of patent reformers from IT was a fabricated prop.

Full post as published by IPBiz on August 07, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)