Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Media & Entertainment Law Blogs -> Sports Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Media & Entertainment Law
: Sports Law BlogFantasy Leagues Now Profiting from the Likenesses of College Athletes
By Rick Karcher, Michael McCann, Geoffrey Rapp, Greg Skidmore, and Howard Wasserman
1. A fantasy college game has never been widely accepted or attempted before because of a reluctance to utilize anything but broad signifiers in identifying college athletes. CBSSports.com had previously developed a game using generic terms including only a team and a position, like "SYRACUSE RB" and "MICHIGAN WR," instead of players' names. But it never caught on with users, due mainly to the disconnect between the robotic names and the fantasy audience, according to senior vice president and general manager Jason Kint.
Yeah. No kidding! You know why it never caught on with users? Because the game only has value if you use their names!!! But I suppose we can keep pretending that players don't have a right of publicity because "fantasy leagues only use their stats which are in the public domain." What a joke.
2. National Collegiate Athletic Association spokesman Bob Williams says that the NCAA did send a letter to CBS informing them that their bylaws were being violated by using player likenesses in the game. But he adds that because of the added exposure fantasy sports can bring the student-athlete, the NCAA does not intend to stand in the way of the fantasy game for now. "We are concerned with protecting the amateur status of the student athlete," Mr. Williams says, but he also believes that the bylaws, which were enacted "before new media," do not properly address a situation like this. Still, he warns that NCAA lawyers will be watching closely.
Umm,....o.k.,....yeah. Let me try to break this down:
a. The NCAA says its bylaws are being violated because player likenesses are in fact being used.
b. But, the NCAA says it is going to allow the violation to occur, for now, because of the added exposure fantasy leagues bring the student-athlete [which is apparently a good thing].
c. But wait a minute, the NCAA says it is concerned about "protecting" the student-athlete from this added exposure. [If you're totally confused at this point, wait, it gets better.]
d. The NCAA says it can't do anything about fantasy leagues because the bylaws don't address this situation. [Go back and read a. and b. again.]
e. The NCAA says its lawyers will be watching closely. I'm not quite sure what the lawyers will be watching, except maybe the continued exploitation of college athletes.
Full post as published by Sports Law Blog on July 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Alta College
Settles False Claims Allegatiions for $7 Million
Settlement Reached in Female Athletes' Class Action
Slippery Rock University Settles Discrimination Class Action
Music Teacher
College of the Desert agrees to $660,000 discrimination and retaliation settlement.
School Misrepresentation
Lehigh Valley College agrees to pay $200,000 settlement for violating consumer protection laws.
NCAA and Ticketmaster
alleging they have a monopoly on college sports events and charge non-refundable fees to enter a lottery for the rights to purchase tickets to the sporting events.

Fantasy or Reality Major League Baseball Still Looking to Cash in on Fantasy Baseball
"Will the Supreme Court Play Ball With Fantasy Baseball Leagues"
NYT Editorial Supports Copyright Rationality in Sports
Fantasy football owners can breath a sigh of relief, for now
1st Amendment prevails in fantasy league case







