Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Race to the BottomAs Predicted: The SEC and the Further Denial of Shareholder Access (A Final Comment) (Part 22)
By J. Robert Brown
We offer one final comment on CA v. AFSCME. The Court noted that those who "believe that CA’s shareholders should be permitted to make the proposed Bylaw as drafted part of CA’s governance scheme" could, among other things, accomplish the result by seeking "to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to include the substance of the Bylaw." In other words, the Court all but held that a mandatory repayment scheme, with no board discretion, was valid if in the articles.
But as we have noted, the offer is an empty one. As we pointed out in Opting Only In: Contractarians, Waiver of Liability Provisions and the Race to the Bottom, management entirely dominates the process of drafting and amending the certificate. Amendments cannot be introduced by shareholders, only managers. Managers, therefore, introduce what they want, not what shareholders want. Moreover, as the paper empirically shows, management drafts the amendments and uses language most advantageous to its own interests.
The Court pretends that there is a solution to the problem created by its decision to strike down the bylaw but the solution is entirely in the control of the board. Shareholders have no ability to obtain these types of amendments to the articles. In other words, the Court would have us believe that its decision only forecloses one method of obtaining mandatory reimbursement for proxy expenses, that others are available. But in fact there are no avenues available to shareholders and the Court's decision practically forecloses shareholders from obtaining these types of provisions.
This is a result oriented decision designed to minimize shareholder participation in the nomination process. It is not compelled by the law but by philosophy, a race to the bottom philosophy.
We have posted a copy of the opinion and many of the primary documents involved in the case on the DU Corporate Governance web site.
Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on July 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Parmalat SpA
Italy's biggest dairy company awaits final approval for a securities settlement that would pay investors $10.5 million
Getty Images
Faces Class Action over Premium Access
Marvell
Settles Shareholder Class Action for $72 Million
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.
Comverse Shareholder Settlement Agreed at $225 Million
Comverse Shareholder Settlement Agreed at $225 Million

Update on the SEC’s Proxy Access Amendment
Draft House Version of Bailout Bill: Includes "Say on Pay" and Shareholder Access
Electronic Comunications and Shareholder Rights
New law #1: DOS releases final rule on ROTC access to campuses









