ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Law Observer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IP Law Observer

Former Employer Who Disclaimed Interest in Former Employee's Patent Was Not a Necessary Party

ADVERTISEMENTS
Case: IpVenture, Inc. v. Prostar Computer, Inc. (Fed. Cir. No. 2006-1012, 2006-1081 9/28/07)

The Two Sentence Summary: The district court erred in dismissing a former HP employee's patent claim where HP had disclaimed all interest in the patent despite an employee agreement requiring assignment of inventions. HP's retroactive disclaimer of interest meant that HP was not a necessary party and did not have rights under the patent even though the disclaimer was executed after commencement of the lawsuit.


Full post as published by IP Law Observer on October 12, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0127 secs (new cache)