Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"U.S. Supreme Court reverses L.A. man's murder conviction; The 6-3 ruling in Giles vs. California makes it more difficult to use out-of-court statements and could be a blow to prosecutors in domestic violence cases"
And Thursday's edition of The Washington Post will contain an article headlined "Right to Face Accusers Is Affirmed in Unusual Case; Witness Was Murder Victim."
Full post as published by How Appealing on June 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Domestic Violence
Women's Rights
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

US Supreme Court Reverses Murder Conviction
GA: Supreme Court reverses pds contempt conviction
U.S. Supreme Court To Rule On Key Domestic Violence Evidence Case
Giles Not the Case To Expand Forfeiture By Wrongdoing
Giles v. California: no "forfeiture by wrongdoing" exception to 6th Amendment








