Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> California Employee Rights Blog

Labor & Employment Law

: California Employee Rights Blog

Family Status Discrimination and Equal Pay Laws

By James Peters

This post is part of our ongoing series dealing with “family status” discrimination.  Family status claims implicate several employment laws, depending on the facts of a given case.  For example, the federal Equal Pay Act (”EPA”) and also California law mandate “equal pay” between men and women.

The fact that women disproportionately care for children in the United States is likely a direct contributor to the fact that women still tend to make less money for doing the same work, despite the EPA and other laws.  This is because such discrimination is often subtle.

For example, a woman might take time off to care for children and when she returns to work make less money than her male counterparts because they have more “seniority”.  While this might be legitimate, “seniority” is sometimes used as a synonym for “loyalty” or “dependability” in reference to the possibility of the woman leaving again to have another child or as punishment for leaving before.

Additionally, mothers who remain in the workforce after having children often start working part-time hours and the other employees often receive a higher rate of pay for “full-time” work.  Reducing a part-time worker’s salary is not per se illegal, but there are certainly pitfalls.  For example, if mothers who switch to part-time have their salary reduced, then it still must be comparable to part-time male workers.  Also, if a woman cuts her hours by 50% and her pay is reduced by 70%, then it can be argued she is being “penalized” for working less.

While not always illegal, an employer would likely have to prove that this is the same rate ALL part-time workers have their wages reduced by and/or that there is a legitimate business reason for doing so.

IntentionalSpam-FightingGobbledygook:5345#$@#*!

Tags

Family Status | Gender | Pregnancy | Wages and Hours

Related Posts

• Q&A: Annual Bonus Not Necessarily Lost When Terminated
• Q&A: Termination for Getting Pregnant is Illegal
• Q&A: Lost Vacation Pay Is Recoverable
• Q&A: Employer Must Reimburse Home Office Expenses

Full post as published by California Employee Rights Blog on June 22, 2008 (boomark / email).