Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Karel's Legal Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Karel's Legal BlogSTATUTORY MERGERS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN
By Karel.Frielink
Mergers mostly within a group of companies
A statutory merger involves at least two legal entities. The law uses the terms acquiring and disappearing legal entity. The law specifies that only legal entities having the same legal form may merge, specifying that a BV (closed limited liability company) and a NV (public limited liability company) are considered to be the same. Statutory mergers are used mostly within a group of companies.
Essential for a statutory merger is that the title of all assets and liabilities of one legal entity transfer in their entirety to another legal entity. An actual transfer does not in fact take place.
A statutory merger has some additional legal consequences. Firstly, the disappearing legal entity ceases to exist. Liquidation or formal dissolution does not take place. Secondly, the shareholders of the disappearing legal entity become shareholders of the acquiring entity by operation of law. The nominal value of the shares involved depends on their shareholding and the exchange ratio. The statutory merger replaces the shares held in the disappearing legal entity with shares of the acquiring legal entity. Generally the acquiring entity issues shares.
There are exceptions to this rule, namely, if the shares of the disappearing entity are held directly or indirectly for the account of the acquiring legal entity. In this case of a parent-subsidiary merger the shares are canceled and no shares in the acquiring entity are issued. This is logical: it is not the intention of the merger that the acquiring legal entity obtains shares in its own equity, which would be the case if shares in the acquiring entity were to be issued. In the case of a sister merger it is optional whether shares in the acquiring entity are issued.
The merger process may be divided into three parts. The first is the proposal to merge. The proposal to merge must be initiated by the managing board(s) of the merging entities.
The second part concerns the decision to merge. The general meeting(s) of shareholders of the merging entities must adopt a resolution to merge, it is permitted however that the acquiring legal entity be allowed to merge by a decision of its managing board.
After completion of the second part, the statutory merger is implemented by the execution of a deed of merger before a civil law notary. The parties to the deed of merger are the merging legal entities.
Karel Frielink
Attorney (lawyer) / Partner
Full post as published by Karel's Legal Blog on June 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Dumb Texas Laws
Stupid Laws in the Lone Star State
Dumb California Laws
Stupid Laws in the Sunshine State
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
California Labor Laws
alleged violations of California labor laws such as overtime pay, discrimination and harassment.
Grubb & Ellis
alleging violations of fiduciary duties to shareholders and securities laws.
Hewlett-Packard and Staples
allegedly violated antitrust laws in collaborating on the sale of replacement ink jet printer cartridges.
Damaged Billboards
Lamar Advertising pays $35,000 settlement after violating permit laws.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Home Buyers Consulting Network, Inc.
$613, 000 settlement reached in federal laws violation dispute.

French Tax Authorities Recognize Dutch Same-Sex Marriage
2-to-1 Mergers: Impossible to Clear
Dutch Supreme Court Refers Questions on Article 5(3) Brussels I Regulation
Dutch court to hear challenge against film criticizing Islam
Muslim nations condemn Dutch Koran film
Mergers in Regulated Industries: Electricity









