Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Disability Law Blogs -> Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Journal
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Disability Law
: Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation JournalCommonwealth Court Holds Employer May Take Section 204 Offset Only After Receipt of LIBC-756
By Robert Vonada
34 Pa. Code §123.501provides:
An insurer shall notify the employe of the employe's
reporting requirements under sections 204 and 311.1(a)
and (d) of the act (77 P.S. §§ 71 and 631.1(a) and (d)). In
addition, the insurer shall provide the employe with the
forms required to fulfill the employe's reporting and
verification requirements under section 311.1(d) of the act.
It was on June 6,2005 when the Employer first sent Form LIBC-756 to the Claimant. The Claimant reported his social security old age benefit. The Employer issued a Notice of Benefit Offset on August 3,2005 providing for a future credit and recoupment of a credit accrued during the past 14 months.
The Claimant challenged the recoupment of a past credit by filing a petition to review benefit offset. The WCJ denied recoupment prior to June 6,2005. The Board and Court affirmed.
The Court stated the Employer has no right to an offset until it complies with 34 Pa. Code §123.501. "While Claimant does owe a duty to report receipt of old age Social Security benefits, the regulations place the initial duty upon the employer or insurer to notify the employee of the reporting requirements and provide the employee with the proper forms." In addition, 34 Pa. Code §123.5(a) provides the Employer may take an offset only after receipt of LIBC-756
Employers are now limited to a section 204 credit only into the future and after receipt of LIBC-756, unless the Employer shows the Claimant provided inaccurate information on a prior LIBC-756. Taking an offset without receiving a LIBC-756 and/or taking recoupment of an accrued offset will subject the Employer to an assessment of penalties.
Full post as published by Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Journal on August 18, 2007 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Restaurant Staff
Win Lawsuit Suit Against Employer for Infiltrating their MySpace Forum
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
allegedly failed to give policyholders discounted rates to which they were entitled.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.

9TH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT NO MATCH LETTERS DON'T EQUATE TO CONSTRUCTIVE KNOWLEDGE
A Few Points on the German Inventor Remuneration Process
Breaking News! 3rd Holds That Employer Cannot Discriminate Against Woman Because She Had An Abortion
Fun With A Custom Receipt Generator
Philadelphia Gun Ordinances Held Preempted by State Law:









