ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Journals Blogs -> Tech Law Forum

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Journals

: Tech Law Forum

Big Telcos Try to Avoid Being Dumb

ADVERTISEMENTS

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hojusuram/484731708/sizes/o for original - under CC license

For years the big telecommunications companies have been desperately trying to avoid becoming commoditized. If they are reduced to acting merely as providers of “dumb pipes” the logic goes, down go profits. So rather than provide truly high-speed Internet access of the sort seen in many other countries, the telcos have attempted to squeeze as much revenue out of customers as possible.

Some of their techniques are novel and clever. Targeted advertising makes sense if you’re at telco. Monitor user activity, deliver targeted ads, and watch the revenue fatten your coffers. If you’re Charter Communications, you try this targeted advertising and make it opt-out rather than opt-in.

Another approach is to throttle the traffic used in particular types of Internet activities, notably P2P filesharing. Of course, you could tell customers you were engaged in this sort of traffic shaping. But Comcast decided such disclosure wasn’t a good idea. Perhaps they thought nobody would figure it out. Customers did find out, and using (duh) the Internet, they spread the word. Now Comcast faces three class action lawsuits that allege deceptive and misleading behavior by the broadband colossus.

Given their track record at disclosure, is it any wonder Net Neutrality advocates don’t trust the telcos to self-regulate? There are those who argue that since the telcos own the pipes, they should be allowed to charge what they will and shape traffic however they like. But as any first year Property student knows, the concept of “ownership” is a sticky wicket. Here’s how one commenter responded to the above-linked ownership argument:

Private property is private property. So no more eminent domain powers for telcos to install fiber through private property, right? If a farmer owns 40 acres in the path of a 1000-mile cable, can he now charge what the market will bear?

Hook me up with a cable that was installed without using eminent domain, and I won?t ask for net neutrality on it.

The establishment of the American telecommunications industry has never been a purely private endeavor. If the telcos want to get the government out of their hair, they need to stop acting as if nobody will find out what they’re doing, and they can no longer pretend that America leads the world in broadband choice, speed, and pricing.

Maybe, just maybe, if the telcos started thinking about providing customers faster, cheaper, more reliable service and more transparent business practices, Congress and those customers wouldn’t mind giving them more latitude.

Image Credits

A cropped version of high wire by hojusuram is used under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 license.

Full post as published by Tech Law Forum on June 08, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0127 secs (new cache)