ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

Safeguard Americans' Right to a Day in Court - Lawsuits Can Potentially Save Lives

By Greg Webb

ADVERTISEMENTS

A recent report from the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) stated many of the published scientific studies used to establish the effectiveness and safety of Vioxx, a painkiller taken by millions of Americans, was "ghostwritten" by the manufacturer. The report not only shakes the public's confidence in the pharmaceutical industry's science, it also alerts them to the even greater threat posed by the Bush administration's recent attempts to cease the litigation that uncovered the secret documents.

Much of the science federal agencies, like the Food and Drug Administration, rely on to determine the safety of consumer products is sponsored by regulated companies. Now it is coming out that the scientific reports are not just funded by the companies, they are being written by them as well. These companies are bending science to their advantage. The regulators who are supposed to be protecting American consumers are not doing their jobs. The FDA officials who were reviewing the studies to decide whether or not to approve Vioxx did not realize that the purported authors had little to do with studies themselves.

The origin of the Vioxx studies is now known because the authors of the JAMA article had access to internal company documents that were uncovered in the lawsuits filed by the alleged victims of Vioxx. These lawsuits, however, are the very kind corporate lobbyists are trying to make impossible and would not have been filed if the Bush administration's attempts to shield the pharmaceutical industry from responsibility had been in place at the time. These lawsuits serve the useful purpose of revealing corporate faults. The Supreme Court has already ruled that certain product liability claims directed at medical devices are pre-empted by federal law. Later this year, the Court will decide whether FDA-approved are pre-empted as well. If companies succeed in getting FDA-approved products pre-empted, consumers injured by the products will no longer have their day in court. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/mcgarity_09edi.e4c6b09f.html

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg Webb

Full post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on June 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0124 secs (new cache)