Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatActavis v Merck
By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.
bolites. Merck already had a patent over the substance for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, which led to a challenge to its patent for the use of a different dose of the same substance for androgenic alopecia. Cue a detailed consideration of "Swiss Claims", including an examination of novelty, inventive step, and unpatentability for being a method of treating the human body.Also at issue was the place of EPO decisions under the doctrine for stare decisis .
More to follow from the IPKat when he has had time to digest the case but, in the meantime he notes [in a fit of shameless self-promotion] that those who want to know more about the issues could do worse than come along to UCL Institute of Brand and Innovation Law's launch seminar (details
here), where Lord Justice Jacob will be speaking about claims limited by use and Actavis.Full post as published by IPKat on May 22, 2008 (boomark / email).
Vioxx Lawsuits
Vioxx personal injury suits are a seroius concern for Merck and patietns
Gardasil
Merck's HPV Vaccine Linked to Paralysis
Merck, Schering
Settle Vytorin Zetia Class Action
Schering Plough, Merck
Settle Multi-State Investigation for $5.4 Million
Vioxx Advertising
Merck agrees to pay $58 million settlement in multistate lawsuit.
Insurers
Reach $80 Million Settlement with Merck over Vioxx

Actavis Recalls Remaining Patches as a Precaution
Pill Manufacturing Oversight Recalls Actavis Generic Drugs
New District of Delaware Filings
Actavis Recalling Remaining Lots of Fentanol Pain Patches








