Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comToobin on McCain: When it Comes to the Court, He?ll Not be a Maverick
By Dan Slater
A couple weeks ago, when we wrote about John McCain’s Wake Forest speech on judges, we thought that the speech, though a bit vague, seemed to be a clear embrace of state’s rights and a jurisprudence of restraint. The New Yorker’s Jeffrey Toobin, writing in this week’s “Talk of the Town,” is a bit more pointed: “McCain plans to continue, and perhaps even accelerate, George W. Bush’s conservative counter-revolution at the Supreme Court.”
Toobin, who writes that the the Bush Administration “has sought to expand executive power in an unprecedented manner” — especially with respect to authorizing torture, ignoring the Geneva conventions, and ordering the surveillance of citizens — chides McCain for blaming the abuse of the federal courts on the judges themselves, who “have taken it upon themselves to pronounce and rule on matters that were never intended to be heard in courts or decided by judges.”
Toobin quotes McCain at length on Roper v. Simmons, a case in which the Court overturned the juvenile death sentence for a 17 year-old convicted of murder. “As you might recall,” said McCain, “the case inspired a Supreme Court opinion that left posterity with a lengthy discourse on international law, the constitutions of other nations, the meaning of life, and ‘evolving standards of decency.’ These meditations were in the tradition of ‘penumbras,’ ‘emanations,’” — referring to the right of privacy established in Griswold — “and other airy constructs the Court has employed over the years as poor substitutes for clear and rigorous constitutional reasoning.”
Might he really be a “maverick” when it comes to the Supreme Court? Toobin asks. Almost certainly, the answer is no. McCain is likely to continue in the tradition of Bush’s conservative appointees — “a phalanx that is more radical than any that the Court has seen since F.D.R.’s appointments.” With John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter not long for retirement, writes Toobin, one unmistakable truth emerged from McCain’s speech: “that the stakes in the election, for the Supreme Court and all who live by its rulings, are very, very high.”
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on May 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.








