Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

C-SPAN broadcasts Ninth Circuit oral argument of case challenging the constitutionality of the federal no-fly list

C-SPAN broadcasts Ninth Circuit oral argument of case challenging the constitutionality of the federal no-fly list: A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in Ibrahim v. Homeland Security on April 18, 2008. This past Saturday, C-SPAN aired the oral argument on "America and the Courts." You can view the broadcast by clicking here (RealPlayer required).

The three-judge panel that heard oral argument consisted of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith, and U.S. District Judge S. James Otero of the Central District of California.

According to C-SPAN's description of the case, "In 2005 Stanford University student Rahinah Ibrahim was handcuffed and detained at the San Francisco International Airport while trying to fly home to Malaysia. After arriving in Malaysia, the U.S. Embassy revoked her visa, and she has not been allowed in the United States since." The Stanford Daily reported on the case in an article published in February 2006.

Full post as published by How Appealing on May 13, 2008 (boomark / email).