Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Environmental Law Blogs -> ESA Blawg
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Environmental Law
: ESA BlawgDesert bald eagle formally "relisted" by FWS in response to Court order
By Keith Rizzardi
73 Federal Register 23966 (Thursday, May 1, 2008)(DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; Fish and Wildlife Service; Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Potential Sonoran Desert Bald Eagle Distinct Population Segment as Threatened Under the Endangered Species Act; Final rule)
Photo of the bald eagle from FWS
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are issuing a final rule to amend the regulations for the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife at 50 CFR 17.11 by designating bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) in the Sonoran Desert area of central Arizona as threatened under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We are also reinstating and clarifying the former special rule at 50 CFR 17.41 that applied to threatened members of this species. This action revises the CFR to reflect the demands of a March 6, 2008 court order.
BACKGROUND: On July 9, 2007 (72 FR 37346), the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service published the final delisting rule for bald eagles in the lower 48 States... On August 17, 2007, the CBD and the Maricopa Audubon Society filed a motion for summary judgment, requesting the court to make a decision on their January 5, 2007, lawsuit (releated to whether the Sonoran Desert population of bald eagles qualified for listing as a DPS under the Act)… On March 5, 2008, the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona ruled in favor of the Plaintiffs. See Center for Biological Diversity v. Kempthorne, CV 07–0038–PHX–MHM (March 6, 2008, D. Ariz.) and related ESAblawg (March 10, 2008). Among other relief, the District Court enjoined the Service’s application of the final delisting rule to the Sonoran Desert population of bald eagles and further ordered FWS to issue its finding on or before December 5, 2008.
ANALYSIS: The rule reflects an interpretation of the CBD petition to list the desert bald eagle, and due to the disjointed nature of some of the desert bald eagle’s breeding habitat, FWS clarified that the Court’s “temporary listing” should only apply in eight southern Arizona counties. The rule will be in effect only until the completion of a more comprehensive 12-month review process on the CBD petition, or until the Court order is stayed or reversed on appeal.
Full post as published by ESA Blawg on May 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Law & Order Depicts Police Procedures and Criminal Justice
Accuracy of Criminal Justice Depiction on Television
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Domestic Violence
Women's Rights
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Windows Software
Microsoft fined $1.3 billion for failing to comply with the European Union's antitrust order.
Music Teacher
College of the Desert agrees to $660,000 discrimination and retaliation settlement.
Desert Hot Springs City, CA
$47,500 settlement reached in wrongful demotion suit.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

10th Circuit Upholds Bald Eagle Protection Against RFRA Challenge
10th Circuit: Federal eagles protection law trumps tribes traditional religious ceremony
L&C Law’s Dan Rohlf, PEAC Win Suit Over Bald Eagle Protection
Press Groups Support En Banc Reivew In Eagle Case
9th Circuit Says Bald Eagle Protection Does Not Violate RFRA








