Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesSidley Announces Settlement of Patent Infringement Claims Against Fourth LED Manufacturer
By Philip Brooks
The following is excerpted from Sidley Austin's May 6, 2008 press release:
Sidley Austin LLP announced today that firm client Professor Gertrude Neumark Rothschild has settled her patent infringement claims against Epistar Corporation, a Taiwanese corporation. The terms of the settlement are undisclosed. The Sidley team consisted of James D. Zirin and Ashe Puri, partner and associate respectively. Peter Toren of Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP served as co-counsel. Professor Neumark had previously settled patent infringement claims against Toyoda Gosei, a Japanese entity, Osram, a German corporation, and against Philips Lumileds this past May for an undisclosed settlement.
Professor Neumark had alleged that Epistar had infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,904,618, ?Process for Doping Crystals of Wide Band Gap Semiconductors,? and U.S. Patent No. 5,252,499, ?Wide Band-Gap Semiconductors Having Low Bipolar Resistivity and Method of Formation? through the unauthorized manufacture, importation, use, sale and/or offer for sale of light emitting diodes (?LEDs?) and laser diode created using the processes described and claimed in each of these patents.
Despite the recognized potential of LEDs, their commercial use was initially limited because it was not commercially feasible to produce LEDs in blue, green and other high spectral ranges. Through the process claimed in Professor Neumark?s patents, it has become commercially feasible to produce such LEDs, and they have increasingly gained general acceptance as a superior lighting source.
Read the full press release here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on May 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.
Underground Piping
Insituform Technologies awarded $4.5 million patent infringement settlement.
DNA Products
Agilent Technologies pays undisclosed patent infringement settlement to Invitrogen Corporation.

Maker of Blackberry Devices Facing New Patent Infringement Challenge
Contributory infringement of patents: a vexed area of law
Deciding Infringement During Claim Construction
New District of Delaware Intellectual Property Case Filings
Federal Circuit Affirms that Northern Districts Patent Local Rules Have Strong Bite
Patent Case for Wrist Apparatus Stayed Pending Reexamination








