Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawFederal court does not have jurisdiction in cases involving public sector unions
By Harvey Randall, Esq.
Federal court does not have jurisdiction in cases involving public sector unions
Baumgart v Stony Brook Children?s Services, CA2, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23301
The Second Circuit affirmed a federal district court?s dismissal of a lawsuit brought by members of the faculty of the State University of New York at Stony Brook alleging the failure of their union?s duty of fair representation.
Physicians on the faculty of State University of New York at Stony Brook School of Medicine also worked as clinicians at the Stony Brook University Hospital. Their income as clinicians is managed and distributed by the Stony Brook Clinical Practice Management Plan (CPMP)
The faculty members allege mismanagement and shortchanging by the CPMP. They filed a lawsuit, alleging a violation of the federal Labor Management Relations Act [LMRA], 29 U.S.C. §185, against United University Professions (UUP) and various SUNY and CPMP entities and officers.
The District Court dismissed their petition ?for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.?
The Second Circuit affirmed the lower court?s ruling, holding that LMRA does not confer federal jurisdiction over labor disputes among states, their employees, and the unions representing such employees, noting that the definition of employer set out in the LMRA excludes entities that are either a ?State or political subdivision thereof.?
As professors at SUNY Stony Brook, these clinicians are employees of the State and are in the State?s ?University Professional Services Negotiating Unit,? which negotiating unit is represented by UUP.
Accordingly, the federal courts, said the Circuit Court, do not have jurisdiction under the LMRA to consider their claims alleging UUP failed in its duty of fair representation.
For the full text of this opinion go to:
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on May 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Salmonella Found in Tomotoes
57 Reported Cases in New Mexico and Texas
ConAgra Peanut Butter
Hundreds of Salmonella Cases Settled
Family Law
involving divorce, child custody, spousal support, common law, adoption and same sex marriage.
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Clopidogrel Marketed as Plavix FDA Issues Public Health Advisory
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation

The Future of Labor Law: The Public Sector; and States as Laboratories of Democracy
Depatment of Justice OK’s Benefits for Children of Disabled Parents in Civil Unions
Bonventre on New York Public Sector Labor Law
Public v. Private Sector Employment








