Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Law Blog - WSJ.com
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: Law Blog - WSJ.comBen Stein and the ?Fair Use Doctrine of Free Speech?
By Dan Slater
Newly-returned from three days at the Harry Potter fair use trial, a veritable crash course in fair use, the Law Blog was interested this morning to read that the producers of an upcoming movie — starring a lawyer, no less — had invoked fair use in a statement they put out.
Online at WSJ today is an article by the Journal’s Ethan Smith in L.A. about a group of filmmakers who, according to the piece, have “incurred the wrath” of Yoko Ono, John Lennon’s widow, for using 25 seconds of the song “Imagine” in their movie, “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed,” which opens tomorrow.
The film, according to the WSJ, stars Ben Stein, a Yale-educated lawyer, game-show host, journalist and actor (”Bueller? Bueller?”) who for the film affects a persona akin to a conservative version of Michael Moore (”Sicko,” “Fahrenheit 9/11″). The film apparently tries to make the point that American academia discriminates against people who espouse “intelligent design” theory — an alternative to evolution that would allow for the participation of a supernatural force in critical biological processes.
In a statement, the film’s producers conceded that they didn’t seek permission, but they called the use “momentary,” and said, after “seeking the opinion of legal counsel it was seen as a First Amendment issue and protected under the fair use doctrine of free speech.” Huh.
The article reminds us that, typically, when producers want to use a song in a film or television program, they need permission from at least two parties: the song’s publisher and the record label that distributes the recording they want to use. Yoko’s lawyer, Jonas Herbsman, of Shukat, Arrow, Hafer, Weber & Herbsman, told the WSJ that the music was not licensed. With respect to the filmmakers, he said: “We are exploring all options.”
Full post as published by Law Blog - WSJ.com on April 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Fair Housing Act
Prevent discrimination by landlords
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action
Disability Access
Developers pay $175,000 settlement for failing to comply with the Fair Housing Act.

Lockridge on Fair Use & Free Speech
Stein v. Stein and the Apportionment of Tax Liability among Divcorced Partners, PART II
Ben Stein and anti-science producers misunderstand copyright AND evolution
Supreme Court of Canada Defends Fair Comment and Free Speech
Rebecca Tushnet on Commercial Speech Regulation and the First Amendment









