ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

The SEC, Rule 14a-8, and Shareholder Approval of the Auditor: Time for a Change in Policy (The Unexplained Shift) (Part 4)

By J Robert Brown Jr.

ADVERTISEMENTS

It seemed clear, therefore, that proposals seeking to induce companies to submit the auditor to shareholders for approval could not be deleted under the "ordinary business" exclusion.  The exclusive authority of the board in this area was not ordinary.  Indeed, the "ordinary" practice was to allow for shareholder approval. 

Things changed, however, in the new millennium, without explanation.  In 2004, shareholders submitted a series of proposals that requested boards adopt a policy providing that 'the selection of the Company's independent auditor be submitted to the Company's shareholders for their ratification at the Company's annual meeting."  A number of companies asked the staff for permission to omit the proposals.  The staff unexpectedly agreed, without analysis, determining that the proposals fit within the 'ordinary business' exclusion.  By 2005, companies routinely received no action relief authorizing the exclusion of these sorts of proposals. 

A year later, shareholders tried to bring the matter to with the Commission.  The New York City Pension Fund submitted a proposal to Rite Aid Corporation seeking ratification authority.  The staff authorized the exclusion without opinion. The Fund appealed, tactfully noting that the earlier letters had allowed for the exclusion of auditor ratification proposals 'without the benefit of any proponent opposition.'  The Fund also stressed the public importance of shareholder approval, something evidenced by the adoption of SOX.  Rite Aid pointed to the decision by Congress in SOX to give selection authority not to shareholders but to the independent directors on the audit committee. Without explanation, the staff denied the appeal and reaffirmed that auditor selection fell within the 'ordinary business' exclusion.

The last post will provide some thoughts on this issue.  The topic is developed more fully in Essay: The Politicization of Corporate Governance: Bureaucratic Discretion, the SEC, and Shareholder Ratification of Auditors.?

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on March 25, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0134 secs (new cache)