ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

House Legislation Would Exempt Private Equity Fund Advisers from SEC Registration

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS
The Small Business Capital Access and Job Preservation Act, HR 1082, introduced in the House by Rep. Robert Hurt (R-VA), would exempt advisers to private equity funds from SEC registration under the Investment Advisers Act. The legislation directs the SEC to define the term private equity fund and also directs the SEC to adopt rules requiring private equity fund advisers to maintain records and provide the SEC with reports the Commission deems necessary after considering fund size, governance, risk and investment strategy. The legislation is co-sponsored by House Financial Services Committee Chair Spencer Bachus (R-ALA).

The Dodd-Frank Act requires most advisers to private investment funds to register with the SEC, including advisers to private equity funds. Rep. Hurt said that the legislation is designed to give private equity firms the same exemption that venture capital firms enjoy under Dodd-Frank.

Committee members are concerned with the private equity registration requirement. They do not see private equity firms as a source of systemic risk. Rep. Gary Peters (D-MI) said that private equity firms are not generally liquid and not highly leveraged, and thus do not pose a systemic risk. It makes no sense to treat private equity firms the same as large hedge funds, he posited. Rep. Hurt fears that the over-regulation of private equity firms could lead to less job creation. He believes that the registration requirement imposes an undue burden on private equity firms. At recent hearings, he asked if the SEC could postpone the private equity regulations until Congress can take further action.

Recently, the Financial Services Committee heard testimony regarding the role private equity firms play in preserving existing jobs and creating new ones by providing capital to struggling and growing companies. Pam Hendrickson, COO of Riverside testified that private equity firms invest in businesses and people, not publicly-traded securities. Private equity firms only make money for their investors and partners when the companies they acquire grow, increase earnings, create more jobs and become more successful. She also noted that the registration of private equity firms under Dodd- Frank will not accomplish the Act?s stated purpose of helping identify and reduce systemic risk in the U.S. financial system. But it will impose an undue burden on private equity firms, especially small and mid-sized firms, in terms of both money and time.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on March 20, 2011 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0133 secs (new cache)