Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> The Legal Intelligencer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: The Legal Intelligencer BlogPunishment of School District Not 'Appropriate' Relief Under IDEA
By Brian Harris
By Wendy Beetlestone
Special to the Legal
In C.W. v. The Rose Tree Media School District, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was asked to define the contours of "appropriate" relief for violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
The parents of a disabled child had placed the child in a private school after they had requested an evaluation by the school district but before their request for a due process hearing was acted upon more than two years later. The parents alleged that the extended delay between the request for a due process hearing and the ultimate resolution of their dispute with the school district was so egregiously prolonged that an award of tuition reimbursement or compensatory education was "appropriate" under IDEA.
The 3rd Circuit concluded that despite the broad discretion given to courts to craft remedies for violations of the IDEA, reimbursement for private school fees was appropriate only if both the public placement violated the IDEA and the private school placement was proper under the IDEA.
In this case, the district had offered the student a free appropriate public education. The fact that there was an extended delay in implementing the individualized education program (IEP) had no relevance to the appropriateness of the education offered to the student. Punishment of the district by requiring reimbursement of tuition did not advance the goal of providing education to those with disabilities and was, therefore, inappropriate.
Similarly, the student was not eligible for compensatory education because compensatory education is designed to compensate students with disabilities who have not received an appropriate education, not to punish schools for failing to follow the established procedures for providing such an education.
Wendy Beetlestone is a shareholder at Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin, where she is chair of the firm's education practice group. She is also the 3rd Circuit reporter for the School Law Reporter, which will publish this entry. She can be reached at wzb@hangley.com
Full post as published by The Legal Intelligencer Blog on March 11, 2011 (boomark / email).
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act
Phantom Income Relief on Debt Cancellation
School Racism
School District pays $250,000 in racial harassment settlement.
Student Harassment
Wichita School District pays $45,000 settlement for high school students' harassment lawsuit.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
The Plainfield School District
$10,500 settlement resolves eminent domain dispute.
Locker Room Hazing
School district to pay $567,500 settlement in harassment lawsuit.
Teachers Paid
LA School District pays 8% interest to teachers for payroll problems.

Parents Were Not Prevailing Parties Under IDEA Because District Voluntarily Complied
Crime and Punishment Symposium at Charleston School of Law
Review of new books on Christian moral practice/punishment/imprisonment







