.
Google

AddThis Social Bookmark Button Post this question to del.icio.us   Post this question to digg   Post this question to blinklist   Post this question to Furl   Post this question to YahooMyWeb   Simpify! this news item   Post this question to shadows   Post this question to Spurl   Post this question to BuddyMarks Social bookmark this page

[Get a free 30 minute evaluation of your injury case by a qualified attorney.]

Personal Injury

Maryland Residents Are Among Lacrosse Team Plaintiffs Suing Duke University for Handling of High Profile Rape Case

38 members of the 2006 Duke Lacrosse team and 9 family members are suing Duke University and the North Carolina city of Durham for their handling of the high profile 2006 rape case that wrongly charged three men with raping a woman.

The plaintiffs say they that they suffered invasion of privacy, emotional damage, and other injuries because the University abandoned them and ignored key evidence showing that the rape charges were fabricated. They are asking for unspecified damages. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.

The three teammates who were indicted, David Evans, Collin Finnerty, and Reade Seligmann, are not included in this injury lawsuit. They settled their lawsuit with Duke last year and transferred to other universities to complete their college educations.

The victim, a female stripper, claimed that the men gang raped her in the bathroom. Evans, Finnerty, and Seligmann were charged with sexual assault, but the charges were dropped last year. Durham County District Attorney Michael B. Nifong was disbarred for manufacturing and suppressing evidence in the case. Nifong, who has filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief, is not a defendant in this lawsuit.

About 20% of the plaintiffs come from Maryland. Both former and current Lacrosse team members are among those suing the University and the city of Durham. The players say that they suffered harassment and experienced hostility during the investigation into the rape case and Duke did nothing to protect them. Traumatic incidents cited included:

• Having protesters surround their homes.
• Being called rapists and racists.
• Becoming the targets of threats and protest marches.
• Imposing disciplinary measures on the team as if they were guilty.
• Canceling the lacrosse team’s season.

Also named as defendants in the case are Duke University President Richard Broadhead, Duke’s medical center, and Durham city officials. The plaintiffs allege that Duke University abandoned the Lacrosse to protect its own image.

In Maryland and Washington D.C., our personal injury law firm represents clients who have sustained any type of serious injury caused by the negligence or carelessness of others.

Other Duke players, parents file lawsuit, Baltimore Sun, February 22, 2008

38 Duke Lacrosse Team Members Unite to Sue Duke University and City of Durham Over Corrupt 2006 Rape Allegations and Investigation, FoxBusiness.com, February 21, 2008


Related Web Resources:

Duke Rape Case

Mcfadyen et al v. Duke University et al, Justia.com

Contact Lebowitz & Mzhen today.

From Maryland Accident Law Blog posted 2008-02-22.

Related Law Questions


















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource









Click here






Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!












Click here
0.2363 secs