Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Religion ClauseRecent Prisoner and Institutionalized Persons Free Exercise Cases
By Howard M. Friedman
In Marzuq v. Albino, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77509 (D NJ, July 29, 2010), a New Jersey federal district court dismissed an inmate's Free Exercise complaint with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff claimed he was required to participate in a therapeutic community in violation of his religious beliefs for refusing to participate by having his classification status increased. However he failed to allege what religion he practices or how his beliefs were violated. His retaliation and conspiracy claims were also dismissed.
In Shiple v. Beck, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78236 (ND OH, Aug. 2, 2010), an Ohio federal district court rejected an inmate's claim that his free exercise right were violated when a restriction on his commissary rights precluded him from buying reading glasses he needed to read his Bible.
In Alford v. Knight, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78607 (ED NC, March 15, 2010), a North Carolina federal magistrate judge permitted plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis with his claim that while he was residing at a Veterans Center, he was forced to participate in religious activities. He alleges he was required to sit through religious services, was punished for closing his eyes during services and refusing to comment or write religious essays.
In Damron v. Sims, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78955 (SD OH, Aug. 5, 2010), and Ohio federal magistrate judge recommended denial of a summary judgment request that the court order accommodation of various Christian Separatist religious practices.
In Kramer v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78777 (WD WI, Aug. 3, 2010), a Wisconsin federal district court permitted an inmate to add an establishment clause claim in his lawsuit challenging a refusal of his request for certain religious items and seeking group worship with other Odinists.
In Dempsey v. Cain, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78965 (MD LA, Aug. 4, 2010), a federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78977, July 8, 2010) and dismissed a claim by an inmate that he was deprived of his Bible and other religious materials for several months. The court concluded that the deprivation did not create a substantial burden on plaintiff's free exercise because it did not force him to significantly change his religious behavior or beliefs.
Full post as published by Religion Clause on August 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Institutionalized Medicaid Recipients
Sue For Right To Choose Where They Live
Michigan
Settles Female Prisoner Sexual Abuse Lawsuit for $100 Million
Salmonella Found in Tomotoes
57 Reported Cases in New Mexico and Texas
ConAgra Peanut Butter
Hundreds of Salmonella Cases Settled
Prisoner Abuse
Somerset County pays undisclosed settlement for failing to provide adequate securities for inmate assaults.

Recent Prisoner Free Excercise Cases
Nelson on the Regligious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
The Alt-Neu clash of anti-discrimination and free exercise
The Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act and DOC Placement of Folks Under Bridges
Ninth Circuit's Khatib decision undermines free exercise of religion








