ADVERTISEMENT

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Religion & Law

: Constitutionally Correct

Judges review Soledad cross issues

By Alliance Alert

ADVERTISEMENTS

San Diego Union-Tribune: "Joe Infranco, a lawyer with the Alliance Defense Fund, which has sided with the government and wants to keep the cross, said after the hearing it was 'very hard to tell' if the judges were leaning in any direction. But he seemed encouraged by the court?s focus. 'The congressional intent is key here,' he said."

Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on December 10, 2009 (boomark / email).

Related Law Articles

Women and the Law
Women in the Justice System (judges, attorneys)

Lawsuits and Settlements

FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review

Pennsylvania Juvenille Detention
Judges Face Class Action

Anthem Blue Cross
Settles with California

Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services

Horizon Blue Cross
Settles Anorexia Class Action

FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes

Related Searches

US Law

#1 Online Legal Resource

Ask Legal Questions

US Law Directory

Class Action Lawsuits

Celebrity Justice

OJ Simpson

VIDEO: NYPD rendering first aid to Empire State Building shooter
On 08-25 at 15:46PM

Acute perpendicular parking #NYPD #NYFD
On 08-18 at 22:18PM

Parallel parking gone bad. Too much gas UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:41PM

UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:25PM

Twitter suspends journalist critical of broadcast partner's coverage on dubious grounds @guyadams #nbcfail #twitterfail
On 07-30 at 17:57PM

Model example of 1st Amendment suppression by the People of New York City's Michael Bloomberg #OWS #NYPD
On 07-12 at 21:07PM

AG Holder lackadaisical on Operation in our Sites domain name seizures & RIAA lobbied free speech suppression @dajaz1
On 06-08 at 22:44PM

Why is the Catholic Church going to court over Obama contraception policy? @NewYorker commentary
On 05-31 at 10:08AM

Monks sue Louisiana for right to sell caskets made from forrest destroyed by Katrina
On 05-31 at 07:47AM

Are the abortion ultrasound laws headed for the Supreme Court?
On 05-15 at 21:52PM

FOLLOW USLaw.com ON TWITTER

Custom Legal Documents

Your Blog Subscriptions Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc

Earn a law-related degree

Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.

Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Final () Chapter of Mt. Soledad Cross Dispute Begins with District Court Ruling

Judge rules Mount Soledad cross doesn't violate U.S. Constitution

Soledad Case Will Continue

Establishment Clause Challenge To Mt. Soledad Cross In Federal Hands Is Rejected

A Cross is a Cross, Especially on Government Land

Mt. Soledad Cross Challenge Back In Court

0.0022 secs (from cache 11/03/26 04:45:20)