ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> Real Estate, Real Competition & The Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Real Estate & Property Law

: Real Estate, Real Competition & The Law

Realcomp wins Round 1 with the FTC

By MICHAEL H. ERDMAN

ADVERTISEMENTS
Here's an excerpt from today's press release from the Federal Trade Commission:
In an initial decision filed on December 10, 2007 and announced today, Chief Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Stephen J. McGuire dismissed a Federal Trade Commission complaint issued last year against a realtors? group in southeast Michigan, ruling that ?upon review of the totality of the evidence . . . it is determined that Complaint Counsel has not met its burden? of demonstrating that the policies of Realcomp II, Ltd. (Realcomp) have unreasonably restrained or substantially lessened competition in the relevant market. McGuire accordingly concluded that Complaint Counsel had not shown that the group?s policies resulted in ?actionable consumer harm? in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.
Here's a link to ALJ McGuire's initial decision (be patient, it's a 144 page, 11mb file).

I have looked over the decision, and note the following-

  • While the ?dual-listing? option noted in the Initial Decision may get an Exclusive Agency listing on Realtor.com, it will not get such a listing on MoveInMichigan.com or Realcomp?s IDX feed, both popular methods for Michigan consumers to view listings. And as for that Realtor.com listing, it will be inferior to the same listing that would show up on Realtor.com if it was submitted directly by Realcomp. This is because different MLSs use different data fields, and certain local data (i.e., the names of appropriate schools) will not appear on such dual-listings. Perhaps most importantly, the dual-listing option is dependent upon the ?bypass? MLS maintaining its current Realtor.com upload policies. Such policies are likely to change should this Initial Decision stand.
  • I have a hard time accepting the procompetitive justifications offered by Realcomp for its Website Policy, in light of the National Association of Realtors? prior statement that Exclusive Agency listings on IDX feeds ?would not detract from the purposes of the MLS.?
  • To sum it up, this ruling essentially concludes that Realcomp?s Website Policy reasonably restrains the public exposure of non-Exclusive Right to Sell listings. I don?t think there is very much reasonable about it.

Full post as published by Real Estate, Real Competition & The Law on December 13, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 10/31/26 06:56:52)