Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Kansas Defenders
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Public Defense
: Kansas DefendersAnother Gant win [NOT FINAL]
ADVERTISEMENTS
Rick Kittel won in State v. Witmer, 100,646 (Kan. App. Sept. 25, 2009)(unpublished), reversing a Riley County drug conviction. The evidence stemmed from a search incident to arrest. The COA noted that, during the appeal, both Arizona v. Gant and State v. Henning were decided and were controlling:Witmer had been arrested outside of her car and placed in the back of a patrol car before the search of the car was conducted. As in Gant, Witmer was secured and could not reach the passenger compartment of the car when the search was conducted. As a result, the was an unreasonable search incident to arrest under K.S.A. 22-2501 and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The COA holds that, because of the Fourth Amendment violation, the "evidence that the officer seized is therefore inadmissible."
Full post as published by Kansas Defenders on September 29, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Final Fantasy XI
Square Enix Faces Class Action over Deceptive Fees and Payments
Parmalat SpA
Italy's biggest dairy company awaits final approval for a securities settlement that would pay investors $10.5 million
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

New law review article on Gant and Buie
SCOTUSwiki Preview: Arizona v. Gant
The Holding of Gant, and Some Initial Questions as To Its Application::
Does Arizona v. Gant Extend Beyond Passenger Compartments:








