Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Norfolk-Portsmouth Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Norfolk-Portsmouth Personal Injury LawyerMalpractice Settlements Not a Lottery for Injured Plaintiffs
By John Cooper
Authored by: James C. Lewis
A recent study, "What We Know About Malpractice Settlements," which appeared in the
Iowa Law Review establishes that the likelihood of payment in a malpractice claim against a negligent physician and the amount paid to the injured patient by that negligent physician was "closely related to the merits of the underlying claim of medical negligence."
"Tort reformers" have long alleged that medical malpractice settlements are an "irrational lottery," where fault and settlement are unrelated. Many critics of our tort system intended to bring negligent healthcare providers to the bar of justice relied on a small analysis in a widely cited Harvard Medical Practice study which was originally published in 1996.
The study which appears in the recent addition of the Iowa Law Review looked at ten other studies completed between 1988-2006 that examined settlements in almost 20,000 medical malpractice cases against doctors, hospitals, nurses and nursing homes. This analysis found that weak claims are much less likely to result in payment to injured malpractice victims than strong claims with only 10-20% of weak cases resulting in payment and then, usually only in a "token" amount, such as forgiveness of unpaid medical bills.
Other hand, this investigation revealed that stronger cases against negligent doctors, nurses, hospitals and nursing homes resulted in payments to injured malpractice victims at a much higher rate (85-90%) and for much larger average payments.
The result of this study should put to rest the frivolous claims being put forth by "tort reformers" that medical negligence cases are unjustifiably increasing insurance premiums for healthcare providers who are supposed to be providing good and safe care to the American public. Rather, this study seems to bear out the fact that those negligent healthcare providers who inflict injuries on their patients are being held responsible for compensating those injured patients by the tort system.
For more information on this subject, please refer to the section on Medical Malpractice and Negligent Care.
Full post as published by Norfolk-Portsmouth Personal Injury Lawyer on December 03, 2007 (boomark / email).
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Gallbladder Surgery Errors Damage Bile Duct
X-ray Procedures Can Reduce Gall Bladder Surgery Error Rates
University of Illinois Medical Center
Potential $14 Million in Malpractice Settlements
Accounting Malpractice - Accountant Malpractice, Accounting Malpractice Lawsuit
Accounting Malpractice alleging financial malpractice by accountants.
Further Settlements Reached in Kitec Lawsuit
Kitec Pumbing Further settlements reached in Defective Products Lawsuit
Hormone Replacement Therapy Lawsuits See Multi-Million Dollar Settlements
HRT Lawsuits Pharma Faces Multi Million Dollar Settlements
$33 Million Awarded to Boy Injured by Drunken Driver
Drunk Driver To Pay $33 Million to Injured Friend
TouchPlay Lottery
Settles with Two More Investors

Structured Settlements in Medical Malpractice Cases
Paid "Misinformant" Chris Padgett on "Structured Settlements For Lottery Winners"
The "Lottery Curse" Strikes Again
Ind. Decisions - 7th Circuit issues one Indiana opinion today
Medmal Case Outcome Linked to Merit
Top Med Mal Verdicts & Settlements in MA for 2008*








