ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> A Georgia Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: A Georgia Lawyer

Georgia: Oil Spill Litigation and a Recent Consent Order

ADVERTISEMENTS
On Sunday, the U.S. District Court Eastern District issued a ruling that Louisiana fishermen were not bound by language in work agreements signed to participate in cleanup and mitigation efforts organized by BP. The consent agreement applies these same protections to any U.S. citizen, according to my friend, lawyer Rick Kuykendall, (205) 252-6127.

div style="width:477px" id="__ss_3965092">Alabama Lawyer Oil Spill Lawsuit

View more documents from R.K..

?A fisherman who cannot fish because of the pollution and who entered into a contract to help clean up BP?s mess was asked to forfeit or minimize his right to make a claim for losses related to the explosion and resultant oil spill,? according to Kuykendall.

According to one of the lawyers on his team:

Attorney Jim Garner explained the offensive language in forms which BP required workers to sign that is now ?null and void?:

- BP, which is mandated to take 100 percent responsibility for the oil clean-up, demanded that the volunteers IMDEMNIFY IT for any accidents that might occur from the volunteers? efforts (Art. 13(F));

1.BP had asked that volunteers WAIVE their First Amendment constitutional free speech rights about the volunteer?s participation in the clean-up efforts of the disaster; for example, if a commercial fisherman signed the proposed papers he or she could not then speak to anyone about the disaster or clean-up efforts until BP first ?approved? of what the volunteer wanted to say (Art. 22);

2. BP asked to be included on the volunteers? insurance policies so that if there is damage to a volunteer?s vessel or other injuries, such as to a crew member, BP will be an ?additional insured? and the financial responsibility for the damage will rest on the volunteer?s insurance carrier, NOT BP, and

3. BP sought 30 days of notice before any volunteer is allowed to pursue legal claims against BP, and there are no exceptions made for emergencies (Art. 13(I) [sic (G]).

Read the Consent Order here.

Full post as published by A Georgia Lawyer on May 04, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











0.003 secs (from cache 10/31/26 04:45:57)