Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Omaha Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Omaha Personal Injury LawyerA Case about Experts
By John Inserra
The Nebraska Supreme Court provides an analysis about when to exclude expert testimony in a toxic tort FELA case. The opinion reinforces the cases of Daubert and Schafersman in Nebraska; stating that the trial Judge is a "gatekeeper" not a "goalkeeper" in admitting or rejecting expert testimony. The case reinforces the conclusion that expert testimony must be based on scientific methodology and not the conclusions that the experts reach. The opinion accepts the notion that scientists may differ in their conclusions and it is simply the Judge's job to determine the validity and reliability of how those conclusions are reached.
Full post as published by Omaha Personal Injury Lawyer on March 03, 2009 (boomark / email).
Job Site Fatalities Increase
Safety Experts Concerned
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis
Female Sales Reps Win Gender Case Against Novartis

Legal experts: O.J. got convicted this time partly because he wasn't last time
Where does your attorney find his experts
Arbitration Experts on the Case That Everyone Is Talking About
WTO Panel Decision on IP Case Favorable to China, Experts Say (TWN)
Experts in Illinois: The Duty to Disclose Begins with an Interrogatory








