Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsRevision of Procedures Relating to Amending PCT Applications
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Christopher P. Singer -- In a notice published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, July 1, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 31372), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published rule changes relating to amendment practice in PCT applications, which took effect on July 1, 2009. The revision is specific to 37 C.F.R. § 1.485 (corresponding to amended PCT Rule 66.8), which will be amended to recite: The applicant may make amendments at the time of filing the Demand. The applicant may also make amendments within the time limit set by the International Preliminary Examining Authority for reply to any notification...Full post as published by Patent Docs on July 02, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Federal Government
Florida residents sue claiming extraordinary delays in judging citizenship applications.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Revision on Technology Import Procedures Announced
Revised Processing Procedures for I-485 Applications
SEC Approves FINRA Rule Change on Expungement Procedures
FBI's Security Check Procedures for Immigration Applications and Petitions
USPTO Requires Written Description in Applications for Trademarks Containing Non-Standard Characters
Is the USPTO Trying to Put Itself In A Better Light On Appeal








