Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesPatent Reexamination: The New Strategy for Litigating Infringement Claims
By Philip Brooks
Strafford Publications is hosting the above-titled webinar/teleconference with interactive Q&A on May 26, 2010.
This CLE webinar will provide guidance to patent litigators regarding common challenges that arise when using parallel patent reexaminations as a litigation tool. The panel will provide best practices for pursuing or defending patent litigation claims involving reexaminations.
Description
Patent reexamination filings are soaring. Companies accused of patent infringement are now fighting back by routinely asking the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to reexamine the validity of the accuser?s original patent.
Reexaminations can be a driving factor in determining how a patent infringement case is ultimately resolved. When patent reexaminations are sought in the context of pending litigation, patent litigators must have an effective strategy in place to confront the unique issues associated with them.
Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys identifies common challenges confronting patent litigators when using reexaminations as a litigation tactic. The panel will offer strategies for pursuing or defending patent litigation claims involving patent reexaminations.
Faculty
- Moderator - Greg H. Gardella, Partner, Irell & Manella
- Timothy E. Bianchi, Shareholder, Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner
- Anup Tikku, Senior Patent Litigation Counsel, eBay Inc.
More information and registration are available here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on April 28, 2010 (boomark / email).
Amazon One-Click Patent Slides Through Reexamination
After four-years of reexamination, Amazon's much-maligned 1-click patent is emerging from reexamination largely unscathed. In a recent notice of intent to issue a reexamination certificate, the USPTO confirmed the patentability of original claims 6-10 and amended claims 1-5 and 11-26...
In re Swanson: CAFC Allows Reexamination Based on Reference Previously Considered by PTO and Courts
In re Swanson (Fed. Cir. 2008) Back in 1984, the patent examiner rejected Swanson's claim based on U.S. Patent No. 4,094,647 ("Deutsch"). The claims were then amended and the patent allowed...
PLI Seminar on Parallel Patent Reexamination and Litigation 2008
Practising Law Institute (PLI) will be holding a live seminar entitled "Parallel Patent Reexamination and Litigation 2008: The Latest Developments and Their Impact" on December 3, 2008 in San Francisco...
Defendant's Knowledge of Reexamination Certificate May Constitute "Objective Recklessness"
Ultratech International Inc. v. Swimways Corp., 3-05-cv-00134 (FLMD March 3, 2009, Order)Plaintiff sued defendant in 2005 alleging patent infringement, but the plaintiff did not plead willful infringement...
Complexities
Predicate Logic sued Distributive Software over 5,930,798, claiming "measurement and analysis technologies for use in software development." During the litigation, Distributive requested ex parte reexamination of the '798 patent, and the claims were allowed as amended during reexamination...
N.D. Ill. Stays Global Patent Holdings Infringement Claim
Global Patent Holdings LLC v. Green Bay Packers (00-C-4623), April 23, 2008Back in July of 2000, Global Patent Holdings (GPH) (formerly Techsearch LLC) filed suit against numerous defendants alleging infringement of U...
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.
Underground Piping
Insituform Technologies awarded $4.5 million patent infringement settlement.
DNA Products
Agilent Technologies pays undisclosed patent infringement settlement to Invitrogen Corporation.
#1 Online Legal Resource
On 08-25 at 15:46PM
Acute perpendicular parking #NYPD #NYFD
On 08-18 at 22:18PM
Parallel parking gone bad. Too much gas UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:41PM
UES NYC
On 08-18 at 21:25PM
Twitter suspends journalist critical of broadcast partner's coverage on dubious grounds @guyadams #nbcfail #twitterfail
On 07-30 at 17:57PM
Model example of 1st Amendment suppression by the People of New York City's Michael Bloomberg #OWS #NYPD
On 07-12 at 21:07PM
AG Holder lackadaisical on Operation in our Sites domain name seizures & RIAA lobbied free speech suppression @dajaz1
On 06-08 at 22:44PM
Why is the Catholic Church going to court over Obama contraception policy? @NewYorker commentary
On 05-31 at 10:08AM
Monks sue Louisiana for right to sell caskets made from forrest destroyed by Katrina
On 05-31 at 07:47AM
Are the abortion ultrasound laws headed for the Supreme Court?
On 05-15 at 21:52PM
 |
|
Contact Us | About Us | Celebrity Law Blog |
Our Partners | Disclaimer
| Law Blog Directory
| Law Jobs
| Law Tweets
| Oil Spill Video
All original material © 1999-2011 by USLaw.com. All other material, including Blog Directory feed content, are © by their respective copyright holders. |