Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> The Patent Prospector
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: The Patent ProspectorPCTs Down Under
By Gary Odom and Jordan Kuhn
Add IP Australia to the list of patent offices selectable as international searching authority and international preliminary examining authority for PCT applications filed with the USPTO. The Australian Patent Office joins the ranks of the USPTO, the EPO, and the Korean Intellectual Property Office, all eagerly awaiting to assist inventors with all of their PCT needs.
From the USPTO announcement:
Effective November 1, 2008, the Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) will act as an International Searching Authority (ISA) under the Patent Cooperation Treaty for international applications filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as a receiving Office, provided that (l) the applications are submitted in the English language, (2) the applications do not contain one or more claims relating to mechanical engineering or analogous fields of technology as defined by certain International Patent Classification classes, and (3) IP Australia is chosen as a competent authority by the applicants of said applications. IP Australia will also act as an International Preliminary Examining Authority if these three requirements are met, and IP Australia acted as the ISA.
The USPTO will collect the search fees from the applicants, and will transmit the search fees to IP Australia. The search fee for IP Australia acting as an ISA for international applications received by the USPTO is $1,514, effective November 1, 2008. Any other fees necessary for search or examination or incidental thereto will be paid by applicants directly to IP Australia.
The $1514 cost is less than when choosing the USPTO or EPO, but significantly more than the KIPO. Of course, this is to be expected based on the relative economic strength of each country, and the fact that the USPTO needs to charge enough to cover the cost of paying and managing their contractors, while still having enough left over to line the pockets of Jon W. Dudas.
Full post as published by The Patent Prospector on November 04, 2008 (boomark / email).

International Patent Paralegal - Law Firm - Madison, Wisc.
FOI disclosure stories 26 January-1 February 2009
FOI disclosure stories 19-25 January 2009
Drop Kick Me Jesus Through the Goalposts of CopyrightThe Patry Copyright Blog
Drop Kick Me Jesus Through the Goalposts of Copyright








