ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> The Patent Prospector

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: The Patent Prospector

Fish Tank

By Gary Odom and Jordan Kuhn

ADVERTISEMENTS

Myth tells us that fish grow to the size of their tank. Reason suggests, related to a USPTO examiner, this myth may prove out.

The current Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) , between POPA and PTO management, which dictates examiner rights, allocates a private office at least 150 sq ft to every examiner at a level of GS-13 or above. If a private office cannot be provided to the GS-13 level examiner, then a decrease in the examiner's production requirement is mandated.

In practice, until recently, a best effort was made to extend this privilege to GS-12 level examiners as well. Translation of GS-12: an examiner who enters the work force with a bachelor's degree and earns all promotions in the shortest amount of time possible will become a GS-12 in two and a half years, but for many examiners it takes significantly longer.

For those who have not been inside the fish tank in Alexandria, the complex includes 4 buildings for examiners to swim around in, each with ten floors. Each floor has a large number of "inside offices" without windows, historically reserved for junior level examiners, and a smaller number of "outside offices" with windows, reserved for senior level examiners and SPEs. Therefore, the private offices provided to GS-12 and above examiners, are the highly desired window offices. Imagine sitting in an office examining patent applications for over 8 hours a day without any sunlight, and you will understand the longing that occurs.

A new Collective Bargaining Agreement is in the final stages of negotiation: POPA fighting for additional examiner rights, Management demanding fewer. Is it still a negotiation when one side won't budge and the other hasn't a chance in hell? Management wanting to solidify its front-runner-status has jumped the gun, instituting changes effective immediately. POPA, crying uncle, posted to its website a summary of management's positions, including:

The agency will not agree to provide private offices for employees GS13 and above, as they are currently required to do. In fact, it will not even agree to provide offices as opposed to cubicles or other arrangements.

Several weeks ago, change began. Fresh fish graduating from the training academy entered their new offices, with a view. Valuable window office space was given to the low men on the totem-poll. The GS-12 examiners occupying those offices undoubtedly welcomed their new roomies through grinding teeth and pursed lips.

A current GS-12 examiner laments:

As for the GS-12s and shared office space, it is true. What's even worse though is that they are moving the GS-12 examiners to offices with windows and then instead of moving other GS-12s or even GS-11s in with them, thus maintaining the spirit of seniority, they are moving recruits fresh from the academy in with them. So now, not only do they have to share an office, but they have to share it with an individual that will be bugging them with an incessant barrage of rookie questions thus effectively reducing their productivity potential even more.

The examiner further comments on the next step:

Word is that they are looking to put the GS-13s in shared offices too; this is just a segue to that step.

Examiners often get a bad rap, doubtlessly with reasonable attribution, but can they be expected to rise to the occasion of increasing requirements with so many factors working against them? It is a huge distraction for an upper level examiner, with high production requirements, to have to share an office with a junior level examiner. Doors are put on offices for a reason. In a job where consistent concentration is key, to be asked repeatedly to explain 102(b) is extremely detrimental. In case you were wondering, there are no plans to adjust production requirements in accordance with the old CBA to compensate for this inconvenience.

Plain and simple, the newly built PTO complex is not large enough to accommodate the growth required to decrease application pendency; hence the hoteling program where examiners work from home. Although an amazing option for some, others would prefer their promised private office overlooking the nation's capital. Additionally, management's failure to open up the hoteling program to examiners below the GS-13 level, thereby reclaiming some office space, sets up a situation for GS-13 and above examiners wherein they are forced to choose between working from home and sharing an office with whatever fish the cat dragged in.

It is no wonder that examination quality is where it is. Examiner growth has been stunted.

Full post as published by The Patent Prospector on February 27, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 08:02:02)